News & Analysis as of

California › Publicly-Traded Companies › Securities Litigation

Hogan Lovells

Chen v. Lyft: California federal court dismisses securities suit where misstatement was corrected within an hour

Hogan Lovells on

In Chen v. Lyft, the U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California dismissed a federal securities class action lawsuit alleging that a typo in a press release from Lyft constituted securities fraud. The press...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Class Action Against Power Solutions And Modules Company

A&O Shearman on

On June 6, 2025, Judge Richard Seeborg of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted without prejudice a motion to dismiss a putative securities fraud class action against a developer of...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Putative Securities Class Action Against Grocery Delivery Company For Failure To...

A&O Shearman on

On May 9, 2025, Judge Edward J. Davila of the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a purported securities class action against a grocery delivery company (the “Company”), certain of its officers and...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Solar Panel Manufacturer For Failure To Allege Falsity

A&O Shearman on

On April 28, 2025, Judge Edward M. Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a putative securities fraud class action asserting claims against a solar panel manufacturer (the...more

Allen Matkins

Why Was 25% Chosen As California's Jurisdictional Threshold For Recapitalization Transactions?

Allen Matkins on

California's securities qualification requirements and exemptions depend upon whether the offer and sale of securities is an issuer transaction, a change in rights, exchange, merger, or conversion transaction, or a nonissuer...more

Allen Matkins

Is A Change In Transfer Restrictions In A Shareholder Agreement Subject To Qualification?

Allen Matkins on

A recent post discussed whether amending a shareholders agreement is subject to qualification under the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968.  For the purpose of that discussion, it is important to recognize that not...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Los Angeles Superior Court Invalidates California Board Diversity Statute, Rendering It Ripe for Review by the California Court of...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

In Crest v. Padilla, No. 20STCV37513 (Cal. Super. Apr. 1, 2022), the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles (Green, J.) declared that Section 301.4 of the California Corporations Code is unconstitutional...more

Allen Matkins

Ninth Circuit Holds Loss Causation Required For California Securities Claim

Allen Matkins on

Section 25400(d) of the California Corporations Code declares it is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, in this state...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide