News & Analysis as of

California › Summary Judgment › CA Supreme Court

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Right of a Party to Oppose Summary Judgment Motions - Even Without Cross-Claims

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on

The Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (Riverside) in RND Contractors, Inc. v. Superior Court (2025) issued a significant published decision. The California Court of Appeal addressed a previously...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

California federal district court grants summary judgment for DFPI in lawsuit challenging state’s regulations requiring...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A California federal district court recently granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) in the lawsuit filed by an advocacy organization seeking to...more

Jenner & Block

California Supreme Court Opens Door for Nonprofits to Sue for Anticompetitive Practices

Jenner & Block on

On July 18, 2023, the California Supreme Court held as a matter of first impression that a public interest advocacy organization maintains standing to bring claims under the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), if it has incurred...more

ArentFox Schiff

Rounding Employee Time in California Is Called Into Question Under New Appellate Decision

ArentFox Schiff on

While neutral rounding policies have historically been approved by California courts, the Sixth District California Court of Appeal recently held in Camp v. Home Depot, 84 Cal.App.5th 638 (2022), that employers who utilize...more

Proskauer - Whistleblower Defense

Ninth Circuit Takes Broad View of Protected Activity under the California Whistleblower Protection Act

Proskauer - Whistleblower Defense on

On October 20, 2022, the Ninth Circuit reversed in part a grant of summary judgment in favor of an employer, finding that the district court misapplied the substantive law of California in holding that Plaintiff’s disclosures...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: June 2020

Payne & Fears on

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020) - Summary:  Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity....more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide