News & Analysis as of

California › Unconstitutional Condition

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Court of Appeal Upholds Traffic Impact Fee Post-Sheetz: Class-Based Development Fees Can Survive Takings Scrutiny

Best Best & Krieger LLP on

The United States Supreme Court’s April 12, 2024 decision in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado unanimously rejected longstanding California precedent. The Court’s decision further solidified that fees imposed as a condition of...more

DLA Piper

Federal Court Declares Proposition 65 Warnings for Acrylamide in Food Unconstitutional

DLA Piper on

The US District Court for the Eastern District of California on May 2, 2025 granted summary judgment in favor of the California Chamber of Commerce, holding that Proposition 65 warning requirements for acrylamide in food...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Ninth Circuit Issues Opinion on Constitutionality of California’s AADC

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Keypoint: The appellate court ruled that the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act’s impact assessment provision is unconstitutional and remanded the case back to the trial court to consider the constitutionality of the...more

ArentFox Schiff

Supreme Court Pulls Back Dormant Commerce Clause in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

ArentFox Schiff on

Federalism — the allocation between federal and state governments — is at the heart of American constitutional law. In a dispute related to the constitutionality of California state regulations dealing with pig farming, the...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Courts Have Found Two Statutes Requiring Diversity in the Makeup of Public Company Boards of Directors Unconstitutional

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In April, a Los Angeles Superior Court held that Assembly Bill (AB) 979 which required publicly-held corporations headquartered in California to diversify by adding “underrepresented communities” to their board of directors,...more

Mintz - Securities & Capital Markets...

California Board Diversity Statute Unconstitutional

Mintz - Securities & Capital Markets... on

On April 1, 2022, the Los Angeles County Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. Padilla, a case challenging the constitutionality of Section 301.4 of the California Corporations Code, a...more

ArentFox Schiff

California Judge Enjoins Proposition 22 as Unconstitutional in Classifying App-Based Drivers as Independent Contractors

ArentFox Schiff on

In November 2020, California voters passed a ballot initiative, Proposition 22, by an overwhelming majority. Proposition 22 exempts certain app-based drivers from the requirements of California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) by...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide