News & Analysis as of

Canada › Class Action › Medical Devices

Bennett Jones LLP

British Columbia Grapples With Evidentiary Issues and the Requirement for a Workable Methodology

Bennett Jones LLP on

The evidentiary burden on plaintiffs to have a case certified­—i.e., the “some basis in fact” standard—has been described as a “low bar” in countless cases. Plaintiffs cite the “low bar” in trying to certify their cases, and...more

Bennett Jones LLP

B.C. Supreme Court Denies Certification of Contested Common Issues in Mentor Breast Implant Litigation

Bennett Jones LLP on

In Bosco v Mentor Worldwide LLC, 2024 BCSC 1931, the plaintiffs alleged that Mentor's silicone gel-filled breast implants, MemoryGel, caused adverse health effects, including connective tissue disorders (CTDs) and autoimmune...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Ontario Superior Court States Clear Rule on Pre-Certification Production of Medical Records in Class Actions

Bennett Jones LLP on

On March 20, 2015, Justice Belobaba released his reasons in Dine v Biomet, a motion concerning the production of medical records prior to a certification motion. The case is a proposed product liability class action...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Change of Pace for Product Liability Class Actions: Certification Denied in Two Recent Cases

Bennett Jones LLP on

Oft-referred to as “quintessential class actions”, the majority of product liability actions that have sought certification as class proceedings in the last 10 years have been granted certification. However, two recent...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide