News & Analysis as of

Canada Obviousness Appeals

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2024 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

As we predicted in our 2023 report, 2024 was a banner year for design rights in the U.S. and elsewhere. In last year’s report, we noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) agreed to consider en banc...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds invalidity of fampridine patent

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed an appeal by Biogen and a cross-appeal by Taro from a decision of the Federal Court... dismissing two actions by Biogen under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds decision finding Seedlings' LifeCard patent invalid and not infringed by Pfizer’s EpiPen

Smart & Biggar on

On July 28, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Seedling’s appeal from the Federal Court decision of Justice Grammond (2020 FC 1, previously reported), which concluded that certain claims of Seedlings' LifeCard...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court dismisses Roche’s PMNOC Regulations actions against Sandoz re: pirfenidone

Smart & Biggar on

By judgment dated May 12, 2021, the Federal Court dismissed patent infringement actions related to Sandoz’s pirfenidone capsules and tablets for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (Roche’s ESBRIET):...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal affirms prohibition order against Apotex regarding abiraterone

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, in the final decision released under the pre-amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), the Federal Court granted a prohibition order relating to Canadian Patent No....more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds Federal Court decision finding Shire’s VYVANSE patent valid

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On October 7, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Apotex’s leave to appeal (Apotex v Shire, Docket No. 39662). The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) recently dismissed an appeal by Apotex from a decision of the...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of first trial decision under the amended PMNOC Regulations

Smart & Biggar on

UPDATE: On July 9, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Amgen’s leave to appeal (see article here). On November 3, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal heard and dismissed the appeal of the first trial decision under the...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada Leave Applications - May 2020

Smart & Biggar on

UPDATE: UPDATE: On December 10, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Pfizer’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39150) (see article here). Pfizer seeks leave in pregabalin section 8 case As previously...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court upholds validity of Janssen’s paliperidone palmitate patent

Smart & Biggar on

On May 5, 2020, Manson J. of the Federal Court issued the second decision on the merits under the amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance Regulations). The Court upheld the validity of Janssen’s patent for...more

Smart & Biggar

First decision under amended PMNOC Regulations: Federal Court finds Amgen’s filgrastim patent obvious

Smart & Biggar on

UPDATE: On November 3, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Amgen’s appeal. See our article here. On April 16, 2020, Justice Southcott of the Federal Court issued the first decision under the amended Patented...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal remands REMICADE new use patent decision on anticipation and obviousness

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Janssen’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39099). On January 12, 2021, the Trial Judge issued the reconsideration decision, again finding the...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal confirms obviousness finding in section 8 bortezomib action against Teva

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court granted Teva’s claim for compensation under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to Teva’s bortezomib product (Janssen markets bortezomib as...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds invalidity allegations relating to patent for metformin formulations not justified

Smart & Biggar on

On March 8, 2019, Justice Fothergill granted Valeant Canada’s application for an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a notice of compliance to Generic Partners for its generic version of Valeant’s GLUMETZA,...more

Smart & Biggar

Orders of prohibition relating to polymorphic form patent for PRISTIQ upheld on appeal

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court, in a pair of decisions, granted orders prohibiting Apotex and Teva from marketing their generic o-desmethyl-venlafaxine (ODV) succinate products (Pfizer’s PRISTIQ) until expiry of...more

Smart & Biggar

Year-end Round-up: Notable Canadian Patent Cases of 2018

Smart & Biggar on

Earlier this month we published an exhaustive review of the life sciences and regulatory cases in the Canadian courts, and decisions on the merits for the year are summarized in our in our Rx IP Update 2018 Highlights in...more

Smart & Biggar

Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due...

Smart & Biggar on

In an action by Apotex for compensation from Sanofi and Schering under the Ontario Statute of Monopolies, U.K. Statute of Monopolies and the Trade-marks Act, the Ontario Court of Appeal has overturned a motion judge’s...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - August 2018

Smart & Biggar on

Teva succeeds in section 8 bortezomib action; infringement counterclaim dismissed - On July 18, 2018, Justice Locke of the Federal Court granted Teva’s claim for compensation under section 8 of the Patented Medicines...more

Smart & Biggar

Eli Lilly’s EFFIENT combination use patent found obvious

Smart & Biggar on

On July 13, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Eli Lilly’s application for a prohibition order, finding that Apotex’s allegation of obviousness of Patent No. 2,432,644 (644 Patent) was justified: Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Apotex...more

Smart & Biggar

Update on AstraZeneca SCC and developments on “overpromising” under grounds other than utility

Smart & Biggar on

SCC Update. On October 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Apotex’s motion to amend the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment in AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 (reported here, relating to...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - May 2017

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal finds that Apotex did not fail to mitigate its damages in relation to Apo-Trazodone drug submission - On April 6, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned the Federal Court’s finding that...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - February 2017

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal rules on non-infringing alternatives and apportionment as defences to an accounting of profits from patent infringement - On February 2, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released a...more

Smart & Biggar

RX IP Update - January 2017

Smart & Biggar on

Apotex’s Infringement of AstraZeneca’s Omeprazole Formulation Patent Upheld - As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision released on January 12, 2017 (2017 FCA 9), has affirmed the...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - November 2016

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal opines on the framework for analyzing obviousness-type double-patenting - On November 4, 2016, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal in Apotex Inc v Eli Lilly Canada Inc, 2016 FCA...more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide