News & Analysis as of

Canada Patent Infringement

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Honeywell Strikes Back Against 'Patent Troll' With North Carolina Lawsuit Under Abusive Patent Assertions Act

Honeywell International Inc. has taken a proactive stance against what it describes as "unwarranted and unfounded" patent litigation by filing a declaratory judgment action in the Western District of North Carolina against...more

Smart & Biggar

Alexion awarded injunction against Amgen in SOLIRIS patent action; Court considers anticipation by incorporation by reference

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court has granted Alexion a declaration of infringement and an injunction preventing Amgen from manufacturing, using, and selling its proposed biosimilar eculizumab product, BEKEMV, in Canada until the expiration...more

Smart & Biggar

SCC to revisit “method of medical treatment” patent claims

Smart & Biggar on

This spring, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will consider the scope of patentable subject-matter as it relates to “methods of medical treatment”....more

Smart & Biggar

Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined...

Smart & Biggar on

On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc ( 2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canadian Patent No 3,003,502 (502...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Un jugement clarifie les délais de prescription applicables aux réclamations pour contrefaçon de brevet en Alberta

Le 28 janvier 2025, une rare formation de cinq juges de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta (l’« ABCA ») a rendu un jugement unanime et très attendu dans l’affaire JL Energy Transportation Inc. v. Alliance Pipeline Limited...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP litigation 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

In 2024, we witnessed several notable developments in Canadian IP litigation. These included the Supreme Court granting leave for an appeal on the patentability of methods of medical treatment, a successful patent invalidity...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Limitations for Patent Infringement Claims: Alberta Law Clarified by Rare Five-Member Appellate Panel

On January 28, 2025, a rare five-member panel of the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) issued its unanimous and much-anticipated decision in JL Energy Transportation Inc. v. Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership (Decision). The...more

Smart & Biggar

Costs awards in Canadian IP proceedings – update and future directions

Smart & Biggar on

Most IP litigation in Canada takes place in the Federal Court. Pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules1, the Court has a broad discretion in awarding costs. However, the Federal Court will typically order the losing party to pay...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian patent law 2024: a year in review - February 11th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

2024 was an active year in Canadian patent law. Canadian courts issued several decisions on the merits regarding invalidity and/or infringement, and considered due care in the context of paying maintenance fees, regulatory...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian patent law 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

2024 was an active year in Canadian patent law, with the Federal Court issuing several decisions on the merits regarding invalidity and/or infringement. The courts also considered issues of the regulation of patent agents,...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds patent ineligible for listing against SNDS

Smart & Biggar on

In Bayer Inc v Amgen Canada Inc, 2024 FC 1849, the Court granted a motion brought by Amgen for a declaration that Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 (276 patent) was ineligible for inclusion on the Patent Register and that the...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Landmark Summer for Design Patent Law

Bennett Jones LLP on

The world of intellectual property (IP) underwent some significant transformations this summer, with recent changes from the U.S. Federal Circuit and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) reshaping the landscape of...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Canadian Patentees are Presumptively Entitled to the Remedies of an Accounting of Profits and a Permanent Injunction

Bennett Jones LLP on

In two companion appeals relating to patents over television interactive programming guides, the Federal Court of Appeal clarified that a successful patent plaintiff is entitled to an accounting of the defendant’s profits...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds patent for concentrated methotrexate solutions obvious

Smart & Biggar on

On March 26, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed Medexus and Medac’s action for patent infringement of Canadian Patent No 2,659,662 (the 662 Patent), finding the asserted claims invalid for obviousness: Medexus Pharmaceuticals...more

Smart & Biggar

Angelcare and Playtex seal another win against patent infringer Munchkin

Smart & Biggar on

On August 17, 2023, the Federal Court issued its decision in Angelcare Canada Inc. et al. v Munchkin Inc. et al. (2023 FC 1111) regarding the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to certain remedies for patent infringement. This decision...more

Smart & Biggar

Dexlansoprazole formulation patent invalid and not infringed by Apotex

Smart & Biggar on

On February 7, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed Takeda’s action under subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations in relation to dexlansoprazole (Takeda’s DEXILANT). Justice Furlanetto...more

Smart & Biggar

Steps to consider before sending a cease-and-desist letter

Smart & Biggar on

The intellectual property (IP) of your business has value. IP can take several forms, including patent and trademark registrations, or intellectual property rights arising from common law, such as trade secrets, confidential...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA upholds inducement of infringement findings relating to paliperidone palmitate.

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court released a pair of decisions relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen’s INVEGA SUSTENNA), finding in a summary trial that each of Pharmascience and Apotex would induce infringement...more

Smart & Biggar

LUMIGAN RC formulation patent found valid and infringed

Smart & Biggar on

In a patent infringement action brought by Allergan and AbbVie under subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), in relation to 0.01% w/v bimatoprost solution for ophthalmic...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP Litigation 2023: Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

The year 2023 witnessed several developments in Canadian IP litigation. From summary judgment finding its limits to the denial of a permanent injunction for the first time in almost three decades, several cases decided in...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian Patent Law 2023: A Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

In our annual review of developments in Canadian patent law, we considered over 60 patent decisions reported last year. This article highlights statutory changes and a selection of interesting points addressed in the reported...more

Smart & Biggar

2023 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

Eli Lilly v Teva, Pharmascience, Riva, Apotex, Mylan (tadalafil, CIALIS) – Following a summary trial, Lilly’s infringement actions were dismissed: composition claims directed to “a physiologically acceptable salt” of...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court declines to grant injunction for infringement of HUMIRA formulation patent

Smart & Biggar on

On December 4, 2023, the Federal Court issued its public judgment and reasons in two patent infringement actions pursuant to s. 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (“Regulations”) and two patent...more

Smart & Biggar

Declaration of infringement does not preclude further NOA based on invalidity

Smart & Biggar on

Update: Janssen has appealed after obtaining leave from the Federal Court of Appeal (A-229-23). On June 28, 2023, Manson J. of the Federal Court dismissed Janssen’s motion for summary judgment in actions relating to...more

Smart & Biggar

Obviousness of Lilly’s tadalafil (CIALIS) dosage form patent stands

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court of Appeal has dismissed Lilly’s appeals of judgments that held Canadian Patent No. 2,371,684 (the 684 patent) claims invalid. The decision, Eli Lilly v Apotex, 2023 FCA 125, was issued on June 2, 2023....more

154 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 7

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide