News & Analysis as of

Canada Workplace Safety Employer Liability Issues

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Québec Court of Appeal Clarifies the Duty to Reassign Pregnant Workers

In Ville de Québec v. Ouellet, a pregnant police sergeant asked her employer, the City of Québec, to assign her safe duties rather than be pulled off the job under the workers’ compensation program known as Program for a safe...more

Littler

Canada: Ontario Government Introduces Significant Changes to Key Workplace Legislation

Littler on

On May 28, 2025, the Ontario Government introduced the Working for Workers Seven Act, 2025 (Bill 30). If passed, Bill 30 will amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), and...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Employment Law in Canada: Recent and Upcoming Changes

The past year has brought significant changes to employment laws across Canada, with major legislative updates in Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Quebec, and at the federal level. With more changes set to come into force,...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Just Released: OHS Lessons for Employers from King v. R., 2025 NBCA 12

Bennett Jones LLP on

On January 23, 2025, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in King v R. This tragic case highlights critical lessons for employers, emphasizing the importance of leadership accountability, adherence to...more

Littler

24 Key Developments in Canadian Labour and Employment Law in 2024

Littler on

In 2024, Canada saw significant legislative and case law developments in labour and employment law. This Insight provides an overview of notable developments and links to our more detailed articles and commentary....more

Bennett Jones LLP

Yule Be Sorry: Avoiding Pitfalls of Employer Liability at Holiday Events

Bennett Jones LLP on

As the festive season begins and employers prepare for holiday social events, they should be digging out their workplace policies and checking them twice. No matter how well-intended, social events that are hosted or planned...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Projet de loi 190 : Délais de conformité pour les employeurs en Ontario

Le 28 octobre 2024, le projet de loi 190, Loi de 2024 visant à œuvrer pour les travailleurs, cinq (le « projet de loi 190 ») a reçu la sanction royale. Comme nous l’avions mentionné dans un bulletin précédent traitant de ce...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Ontario’s Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 - More Rules for Employers?

On October 28, 2024, Ontario’s Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 received Royal Assent. This is the fifth such act since 2021. ...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Bill 190, Working for Workers Five Act, 2024: Compliance Deadlines for Ontario Employers

On October 28, 2024, Bill 190, the Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 (Bill 190) received royal assent. As noted in our previous bulletin on this topic, Bill 190 amends various employment-related legislation in Ontario,...more

Littler

Ontario, Canada: Bill 190, Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 Receives Royal Assent

Littler on

On October 28, 2024, Ontario’s Bill 190, Working for Workers Five Act, 2024 (Bill 190), received Royal Assent. Among other things, Bill 190 amends the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), Occupational Health and Safety...more

Littler

Ontario, Canada Court Affirms City Lacked Control of Workplace and Exercised Due Diligence, Upholding Acquittal of OHSA Charges

Littler on

In R. v. Greater Sudbury (City), 2024 ONSC 3959, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (OSCJ) dismissed an appeal of the trial judge’s decision in which she acquitted the City of Sudbury (City) of various charges under...more

Littler

Ontario, Canada Appeal Court Confirms Employment Contract Frustrated by Employee’s Refusal to Comply With COVID-19 Vaccination...

Littler on

In Croke v. VuPoint System Ltd., 2024 ONCA 354, the Court of Appeal for Ontario (OCA) upheld the Superior Court of Justice – Ontario (SCJ)’s summary judgment decision that an employee’s refusal to comply with their employer’s...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Alberta : Une entrevue peut être menée sans la présence d’un avocat lors d’une enquête sur un accident de travail

Dans le cadre de l’affaire Neustaedter v. Alberta (Labour Relations Board), la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta (la « CAA ») a récemment confirmé une décision rendue lors d’un appel devant le Conseil des relations de travail de...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Alberta Court of Appeal Upholds Ruling on Denying Legal Counsel in Occupational Health and Safety Interviews

In a recent decision in Neustaedter v. Alberta (Labour Relations Board), the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) upheld an appeal from the Alberta Labour Relations Board confirming penalties to the appellants under the Alberta...more

Ius Laboris

Canadian court upholds termination of unvaccinated worker

Ius Laboris on

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that an employee’s failure to meet COVID-19 vaccination requirements imposed by a third party amounted to frustration of the employment contract. As a result, there was no obligation...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Coming into force of Bill 42: An Act to prevent and fight psychological harassment and sexual violence in the workplace

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

On March 27, 2024, Bill 42, an Act to prevent and fight psychological harassment and sexual violence in the workplace, was assented to by the Lieutenant governor of Québec ("Bill 42"). Jean Boulet, Minister of Labour,...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Quebec Adopts New Bill to Tackle Psychological Harassment and Sexual Violence in the Workplace

On March 27, 2024, Bill 42, An Act to prevent and fight psychological harassment and sexual violence in the workplace (Act), was sanctioned by the Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec. The Act’s purpose is to provide greater...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Promulgation du projet de loi 149 de l’Ontario : Modifications apportées à diverses lois qui concernent les employeurs

Le 21 mars 2024, le projet de loi 149 de l’Ontario, intitulé Loi de 2024 visant à œuvrer pour les travailleurs, quatre (le « projet de loi 149 »), a reçu la sanction royale. Le présent bulletin résume les principales...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Harcèlement psychologique et violence à caractère sexuel en milieu de travail : sanction du projet de loi n° 42

Le 27 mars 2024, le projet de loi n° 42, Loi visant à prévenir et à combattre le harcèlement psychologique et la violence à caractère sexuel en milieu de travail (la « Loi »), a été adopté par l’Assemblée nationale du Québec....more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Ontario’s Bill 149 Becomes Law, Enacts Key Reforms for Employers

On March 21, 2024, Ontario’s Bill 149, Working for Workers Four Act, 2024 (Bill 149) received royal assent. Summarized below are the key amendments to the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), Workplace Safety and Insurance...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Fundamental Breach or Reasonable Balance? Alberta Court Affirms Employer’s Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy

Bennett Jones LLP on

In the case of Van Hee v Glenmore Inn Holdings Ltd., 2023 ABCJ 244 (Van Hee), Justice L.L. Burt of the Alberta Court of Justice (the Court) held that an employer was justified in unilaterally placing an employee on an unpaid...more

Littler

Alberta, Canada Court Holds Placing Employee on Unpaid Leave for Failure to Comply with Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy is...

Littler on

In Van Hee v Glenmore Inn Holdings Ltd., 2023 ABCJ 244 (Glenmore), the Alberta Court of Justice found that an employer’s mandatory vaccination policy was a reasonable, justified and lawful response to the extraordinary...more

Littler

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms “Owners” of Construction Projects Are “Employers” Under OHSA

Littler on

The Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City), 2023 SCC 28 was equally divided (4-4).  In the absence of a majority SCC decision, the City's appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Court...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Élargir la portée de la responsabilité : décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’affaire R. c. Grand Sudbury (Ville)

La Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC »), dans l’affaire R. c. Grand Sudbury (Ville), a déclaré que la Ville du Grand Sudbury (la « Ville ») peut, à titre d’« employeur » en vertu de la Loi sur la santé et la sécurité au...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Widening the Lens of Liability: The Supreme Court’s Decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City)

In R. v. Greater Sudbury (City), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has ruled that the City of Greater Sudbury (City) can be held liable as an “employer” under Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) for the death...more

139 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide