News & Analysis as of

Causation Appeals Department of Justice (DOJ)

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

First Circuit Decision Raises Bar on Anti-Kickback Statute-Premised Liability Under the False Claims Act

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently joined the Sixth Circuit (2023) and Eighth Circuit (2022) in holding that the term “resulting from” in the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) (as amended in...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

First Circuit Joins Other Circuits in Adopting Stricter Causation Standard in FCA Cases Based on Anti-Kickback Statute

On February 18, 2025, the First Circuit joined the Sixth and Eighth Circuits in adopting a “but for” causation standard in cases involving per se liability under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and the False Claims...more

McGuireWoods LLP

First Circuit Adopts “But For” AKS Standard, Leaving Third Circuit Alone in Causal-Link Standard

McGuireWoods LLP on

On Feb. 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted the “but for” causality standard for violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) that give rise to violations of the federal False Claims Act...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

First Circuit Clarifies FCA Liability Standard for AKS Violations, Deepening Circuit Split

The First Circuit has issued its long-anticipated opinion in United States v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., clarifying the standard for establishing False Claims Act (“FCA”) liability based on Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”)...more

Stevens & Lee

First Circuit Rules Against Government in False Claims Act Case

Stevens & Lee on

On Feb. 18, in U.S. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the First Circuit Court of Appeals joined the Sixth Circuit and the Eighth Circuit in holding that, for purposes of establishing that a claim for payment of items or services...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Anti-Kickback Statute Premised False Claims Cases: The “But For” Causation Standard Finds Support from First Circuit

Foley & Lardner LLP on

It’s now 3–1, with the First Circuit (2025) aligning with the Sixth (2023) and Eighth (2022) Circuits finding the meaning of the words “resulting from” — as used in a 2010 amendment to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS)...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigation Newsletter: Teva Pharmaceuticals Agrees to Pay $450 Million to Resolve FCA Claims

ArentFox Schiff on

Teva Pharmaceuticals Agrees to Pay $450 Million to Resolve FCA Claims - On October 10, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Teva Neuroscience Inc. will pay $450 million to...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: District Court Declines to Stay Case Pending Resolution of FCA Causation Standard Issue Before Court of...

ArentFox Schiff on

District Court Declines to Stay Case Pending Resolution of FCA Causation Standard Issue Before Court of Appeals - Earlier this week, a Massachusetts federal judge denied a motion to stay proceedings filed by Medtronic,...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

Recent FCA and AKS Litigation Highlights Use of Different Standards in Different Circuits

In an important decision limiting the reach of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b)) (“AKS”) and its application to violations of the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq.) (“FCA”), the U.S. Court of...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Courts Grapple with Causation Requirement in FCA Cases Based on Violations of Anti-Kickback Statute

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Congress amended the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) in 2010 to confirm that a claim “resulting from” an AKS violation constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(g). However, Congress did...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide