News & Analysis as of

Cease and Desist Orders Patents Patent Infringement

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Strategic Enforcement Before the U.S. International Trade Commission – An Evaluation of Recent Enforcement Proceedings

Investigations under 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (Section 337) before the U.S. International Trade Commission can provide relief against unfair acts in the import trade. The most common causes of action include infringement of U.S....more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

USITC Commissioner Series: Top Dissenting Issues

Following my colleagues’ efforts in this series, this post examines the dissent/concurrence practice of the Commissioners at the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) – specifically the “hot” issues that drew the most...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 16th Annual Practitioners’ Think Tank on ITC Litigation & Enforcement - May 29th - 30th, Washington, DC

Returning to Washington in May, ACI’s 16th Annual Practitioners’ Think Tank on ITC Litigation & Enforcement is your opportunity to learn from and network with key members of the ITC Bench, senior ITC Attorneys and leading...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2022 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis and Trends: ITC: Design Patents Continue to Outperform on Obtaining Remedies at the...

Last year, in our inaugural issue of “The Year in Review,” we reported that since the landmark jury verdict in the IP litigation between Apple and Samsung in 2012, which awarded more than $1B to Apple for infringement of...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2021 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis and Trends

This year, we will mark the 10-year anniversary of the first jury verdict in the landmark IP litigation between Apple and Samsung, which resulted in the jury awarding more than $1B to Apple. More than $500M of that award was...more

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLC

Dear Patenticity: Infringed and Weighing a C&D Letter

Dear Patenticity, We recently found that an out-of-state competitor is infringing one of our patents.  I know we need to put a stop to it, but I’m worried about the cease-and-desist letter.  I heard that there was a recent...more

Quinn Emanuel

Noted with Interest: The Federal Circuit Blurs a Once Bright-Line Rule Regarding Personal Jurisdiction

Quinn Emanuel on

Patent owners seeking to assert their rights in forums outside their home states may now need to think twice about whether to hit send on a cease-and-desist or demand letter. For the past two decades, since the Federal...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

MarkIt to Market® - November 2021: Watching the Pot™

ITC to Determine if Importing of Oil-Vape Cartridges to Go Up in Smoke - The ITC recently initiated an investigation into whether 38 manufacturers' imports of oil-vape cartridges used to smoke cannabis and THC infringe a...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

MarkIt to Market® - November 2021

The November 2021 issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to Market® newsletter discusses the emergence of trademark filings for NFTs and a recent ITC patent infringement case regarding imported oil-vape cartridges. In this...more

Haug Partners LLP

When Sending a Cease and Desist Letter Establishes Personal Jurisdiction

Haug Partners LLP on

A patentee may establish “minimum contacts” in a forum, thus subjecting itself to specific personal jurisdiction, by sending a cease and desist letter to the forum. Precedent concerning this issue has been evolving....more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Cease and Desist Letters Need to Balance Effectiveness While Considering Consequences

Ladas & Parry LLP on

Letters demanding that a company “cease and desist” what the sender of the letter deems an infringement of the sender’s intellectual property rights – whether patent, trademark or copyright – are communications primarily to...more

Goodwin

ITC 337 Quarterly Insider Q2 2020

Goodwin on

Goodwin’s 337 Quarterly Insider remains the premiere publicly available source for keeping up to date on all meaningful decisions coming out of the Commission. Please find below Goodwin’s insights on the months of April, May,...more

Jones Day

Redesign Cleared Following Adverse Initial Determination

Jones Day on

In an dispute involving garage door openers, Respondent successfully utilized a Modification Proceeding pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337(k) to obtain a determination from the ITC that its redesigned product did not infringe the...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

District Court denies motion to dismiss despite Federal Circuit’s finding of patent invalidity in appeal of parallel ITC...

On December 5, 2019, Judge David C. Godbey of the Northern District of Texas denied the defendant Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.’s (“Diebold”) motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), in Nautilus Hyosung Inc. v. Diebold, Inc. et al.,...more

Jones Day

ITC Imposes Fine for Violating Cease and Desist Order

Jones Day on

In a recent Enforcement Initial Determination, ALJ Shaw held that Sony had violated previously issued cease and desist orders (“CDOs”) and determined that the appropriate penalty was a fine of $210,134 – Sony’s net profit...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Trending - Designing Around a Patent as an Alternative to a License

Robinson & Cole LLP on

In some instances in which a company finds itself in the cross-hairs of a patent infringement cease-and-desist letter or lawsuit, a license may not be a viable option. That is often the case when the patent holder is a...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Commission Reverses Apple Infringement Finding, Thereby Mooting the Public Interest Inquiry...For Now

On March 26, 2019, the International Trade Commission issued its Final Determination in Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Process Components Thereof, 337-TA-1065. The 1065 Investigation is one of...more

Jones Day

Commission Cleans Up Remedies for Robotic Vacuum Cleaners

Jones Day on

While it is well understood that the ITC can issue an exclusion order to stop the importation of articles found to infringe a patent, it is not as well known that such orders can also prevent certain domestic activities. A...more

Jones Day

Don’t Forget to Bring Your Redesigned Products to the ITC

Jones Day on

The ITC recently modified a previously issued remedial order such that certain of the Respondents’ redesigned products were not covered by the limited exclusion order (LEO) or the cease and desist order (CDO). Certain Network...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Improper Reliance on Informal “Opinion of Counsel” Part of Basis for Exceptional Case Award

In Drop Stop LLC v. Jian Qing Zhu et al, 2-16-cv-07916 (CACD January 22, 2018), the Central District of California granted Plaintiff’s motion to award attorney fees due to Defendants’ exceptional litigation tactics under 35...more

Jones Day

ITC Clarifies Domestic Industry Requirement for Unregistered Trade Dress

Jones Day on

The ITC issued an Opinion finding a violation of Section 337 and issuing a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Of note, the Commission clarified that the “domestic industry” for unregistered trade dress need...more

Jones Day

ITC Remains Unpersuaded by Final PTAB Rulings

Jones Day on

This week the ITC stood firm in its position that final PTAB rulings of unpatentability in IPR proceedings are not grounds to modify, suspend, or rescind remedial orders. In Certain Foam Footwear, Inv. No. 337-TA-567, the ITC...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Stay Order Demonstrates Value of Redesign as Defense in ITC Actions

Jones Day on

The Federal Circuit has determined to partially stay an ITC exclusion order as it pertains to products redesigned after the remedial orders issued. We have previously posted about Certain Network Devices, Related Software and...more

Knobbe Martens

ITC Issues Limited Exclusion Order of Diebold ATMs Following Finding of Patent Infringement

Knobbe Martens on

Patent Judgments and Awards - On July 14, 2017, the International Trade Commission determined that financial services company Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. (“Diebold”) violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing ATMs and...more

Jones Day

No Stay of Remedial Orders Even After PTAB Finds Claims Unpatentable

Jones Day on

The ITC has dealt a significant blow to the use of Inter Partes Review as a defense to a Section 337 investigation. In an order issued this week, the Commission denied a request to stay remedial orders that are currently on...more

35 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide