News & Analysis as of

Cohabitation Divorce

Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal...

Threatening a Wife with Polygamous Cohabitation Legal Consequences

A recent ruling by a UAE court determined that persistent threats by a husband about polygamous cohabitation will be considered to be psychological or mental harm to his wife. Polygamous cohabitation refers to multiple wives...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Love Actually: Planning Considerations for Marriage, Divorce, Cohabitation, the Death of a Spouse, and More

Welcome to The Verdict: Estate Planning Through Film. Today, Farella podcast host Hons Yung is joined by Gigi Orta, a managing director at J.P. Morgan Private Bank, to discuss the movie Love Actually. Gigi and Hons...more

Blank Rome LLP

Protecting Your Family Matters: Spring 2025

Blank Rome LLP on

The Silent Divorce. Understanding the Sounds Beneath the Quiet. When we think about a marriage on the rocks, or one that is perhaps nearing its final moments, we often paint a picture of frequent, rancorous disagreements...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Alimony Terminated for Cohabitation Without a Hearing Because Recipient Refused to Cooperate with Discovery About Her Finances

Fox Rothschild LLP on

We have written a lot about termination of alimony based upon cohabitation, both before the 2014 Amendment to the alimony statute making it easier, and after the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cardali case. Typically,...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

We Never Got Married, Can You Help Me?

There have always been those couples who decide, for whatever reason, not to get married. They continue to live together and build a life together without the formality of marriage. So, what happens when a relationship like...more

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC

Dating Apps and Divorce

Dating apps are the most popular place to find people to date. As a divorce attorney, I hear many anecdotes from clients or former clients who met their new partner on a dating app. However, there are a few considerations...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Alimony & the Cohabitation Dilemma

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In 1980 Pennsylvania revised its 1929 Divorce Code and for the first time allowed post divorce alimony. It was a tough legislative battle with conservative forces professing concern that divorce would become ubiquitous. One...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

A 21st Century Visit to the Alimony Bar

Fox Rothschild LLP on

When drafted and adopted as law in the 1980 Divorce Code, Section 706 (now 3706) was disarmingly simple. It said, 706. Bar to alimony - No petitioner is entitled to receive an award of alimony where the petitioner,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

The “Terms of Engagement” in Campbell v. Tang Suggest Engagement in Pennsylvania is a “Risky Business.”

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Jian Tang and Robert Campbell met in May 2016 on Match.com., an online dating site. Things appear to have progressed nicely. They began to live together and in March 2017, Campbell came forth with a proposal of marriage. Not...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Top 10 Posts Read in 2022 – JD Supra style

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Yesterday, I posted the Top 10 Posts in 2022 on our NJ Family Law Blog as measured by page views. Aside from publishing the posts directly on our blog, the posts are also shared on a content aggregator, JD Supra which...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Top 10 Posts of 2022

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The end of the year is the time for holiday merriment and top 10 lists. As a kid, I used to love to listen to Casey Kasem’s countdown of the top songs of the year. So I decided to do a top 10 list related to posts on this...more

Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson PLLC

Not Married, Not a Problem: Washington State’s “Committed Intimate Relationship” Doctrine Provides a Means for Some Unmarried...

In a divorce, the judge will have to divide your marital property and debts between the spouses. The division must be “just and equitable” under the circumstances of the relationship. But can an unmarried couples receive a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

No Prima Facie Showing Of Cohabitation = No Right To Discovery To Try To Prove It

Fox Rothschild LLP on

For the second time in about a month, the Appellate Division has reversed improvidently granted discovery when there hadn’t been a showing of a change of circumstance. As noted by Eliana Baer on this blog on August 12, 2019...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Division Reverses Trial Court’s Denial Of Payor’s Motion To Terminate Alimony In Unique Cohabitation Scenario

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Demonstrating yet again that cohabitation cases are almost always a creature of their specific facts and circumstances, the Appellate Division in the recently unpublished, Salvatore v. Salvatore, reversed a trial court’s...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Division Issues New Decision On Cohabitation

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In the midst of our ongoing quest for guidance as to how and when to apply the 2014 cohabitation statute, comes the Appellate Division’s recent unpublished (not precedential) decision in J.S. v. J.M. While the decision does...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Division Denies Cohabitation Claim Under Alimony Statute

Fox Rothschild LLP on

While we await guidance from the Appellate Division on how to interpret that portion of the amended alimony statute’s cohabitation provision, N.J.S.A. 2A:32-23n, indicating that alimony may be “suspended or terminated” in the...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide