News & Analysis as of

Commercial Litigation Class Action Competition

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Commercial Litigation Outlook - 2025

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Last year’s Commercial Litigation Outlook was dominated by the promise and peril that AI poses to myriad industries. No doubt, the evolution of AI in the last year has been significant, and it is still a material...more

K&L Gates LLP

Third-Party Litigation Funding in England and Wales Post-PACCAR: Where Are We Now?

K&L Gates LLP on

In our earlier alert on third-party funding (TPF) and the UK Supreme Court’s decision in PACCAR, we discussed the initial industry reaction, subsequent litigation, and legislative reform proposals (at the time, through the...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Jensen v. Samsung: Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Evidentiary Requirement More Than “Mere Formality”

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89, the Federal Court of Appeal (the “Court”) upheld the lower court’s refusal to certify a proposed class action involving allegations that the defendants had breached...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide