News & Analysis as of

Consumer Fraud Supreme Court of the United States

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 16, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in two cases today: First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin, No. 24-781: This case concerns the appropriate forum for raising constitutional...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Advertising Litigation Report: Vol. 2, No. 1

Lanham Act False Advertising - Lanham Act Liability for Native Advertising Violations - Casper Sleep, Inc. v. Mitcham, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, No. 16 Civ. 3224 (JSR), 2016 WL 4574388 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2016) - ...more

BCLP

Fraudster Beware: Your Scheme to Defraud Could be a Federal Crime if it Involves a Bank

BCLP on

Normally, a scheme to defraud another individual would be a state crime, prosecuted and sentenced at the state level (leaving aside use of U.S. mail or wires). To be convicted of the state crime of fraud usually requires...more

Littler

California Laws Are Being Used to Advance Human Rights Claims Based on Global Supply Chain Activities

Littler on

Recent class actions have claimed that companies have violated California consumer fraud and unfair competition laws resulting from alleged forced labor in their global supply chains.  These state law claims argue that...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

11th Circuit: Rule 23 Trumps State Law Limitation on Class Actions

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Dealing a blow to defendants facing consumer fraud litigation in the 11th Circuit, the court of appeals for that circuit has reinstated a class action under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practice Act (ADTPA), despite that the...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide