News & Analysis as of

Consumer Protection Laws › Summary Judgment › Statutory Interpretation

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

The Double-Edged Sword of Chapter 93A, Section 11 in Massachusetts Business Litigation

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on

Introduction - One of the most potent tools in Massachusetts commercial litigation is Chapter 93A, § 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Designed to deter “unfair” or “deceptive” conduct in “trade or commerce,” Section...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

No Harm, No Foul: Statutory Violations and Consumer Harm

Hudson Cook, LLP on

"No harm, no foul" is a common saying. As it turns out, that saying is sometimes true in law. An important prerequisite for a lawsuit in federal court is that the plaintiff have standing to sue....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Adopts Narrow Interpretation of “Telephone Solicitations”

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed entry of summary judgment against a TCPA plaintiff and adopted the Eastern District of Wisconsin’s interpretation of the phrase “telephone solicitations.” Hulce v. Zipongo, Inc., — F. 4th...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide