News & Analysis as of

Court of Federal Claims › Contract Termination › Federal Contractors

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Challenging Trump 2.0 En Masse Contract Terminations

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The Trump administration’s en masse terminations for the government’s convenience-as-a-budget-cutting tactic may constitute contract breaches, thereby entitling contractors to lost profits....more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Can the Government Terminate a Contract for Convenience When It Does Not Actually Terminate the Contract for Convenience?

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Court of Federal Claims rules that the government “constructively” terminated a contractor for convenience when it did not order the quantities specified in the contract. The “constructive termination for convenience”...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

The Court of Federal Claims Provides Guidance on Factors for the Government to Consider in a Default Termination

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

A recent case from the Court of Federal Claims provides us instruction on the factors that the government should consider in determining whether to terminate a construction contract for default. This case provides a detailed...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide