News & Analysis as of

Criminal Prosecution › Supreme Court of the United States › Banks

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

U.S. Supreme Court Draws the Line: Misleading Statements Aren’t Always False

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,... on

Last week a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Thompson v. United States, 2025 WL 876266 (2025), holding that a statement that is literally true but allegedly misleading, is not a “false statement” under 18...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Comity or Condemnation: Supreme Court to Decide Whether State-Owned Bank is Immune from Criminal Prosecution Under the Foreign...

Foley Hoag LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States is set to determine whether the United States can prosecute a commercial bank, which is majority-owned by the Republic of Turkey, for allegedly violating U.S. law. In 2019, U.S. federal...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"2016-17 Supreme Court Update"

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In a season of political surprises, the eight-member U.S. Supreme Court has stirred no controversy with its decisions so far this term. The handful of opinions the Court released in the fall were unanimous and, for the most...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Supreme Court’s Broad Interpretation of the Bank Fraud Statute May Provide a Potent Tool in Combatting Cybercrime

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

The Supreme Court in Shaw v. United States recently held that the federal bank fraud statute does not require that defendants cause, or intend to cause, an actual financial loss to the financial institutions they seek to...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide