News & Analysis as of

DACA Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Trump Administration

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: A New Era for Immigration Policy and Enforcement: Five Key Issues Affecting Higher Education Institutions - The...

Jenner & Block on

With a promise to deliver the “largest deportation” in the history of the United States, President Trump’s 2024 campaign foreshadowed a new era of immigration policy and enforcement. The first two weeks of the second Trump...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Advance Parole Process Unaffected by Trump EO, But Confusion + Delay Expected Anyway

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Humanitarian parole programs for individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela have been cancelled by President Trump’s Executive Order (EO) on Securing Our Borders. USCIS’s Uniting for Ukraine application process has...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

What Employers Should Know About the New Immigration Orders

CDF Labor Law LLP on

On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump returned to the presidency. Within two hours of assuming office, he executed a series of executive orders intended to carry out a restrictive and enforcement heavy immigration agenda. While...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

The Potential Impacts of President Trump’s Administration on DACA and Temporary Protected Status

President Donald Trump has indicated a strong intention to eliminate both the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) programs, which allow foreign nationals to temporarily live and...more

Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Potential Immigration Impacts for U.S. Employers Under a Second Trump Presidency

Shipman & Goodwin LLP on

As we head into another Trump presidency later this month, many U.S. employers are wondering how the new administration’s strong stance on immigration might impact their organization, including its ability to hire and retain...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

President Biden’s Parole in Place Initiative and DACA: Key November 2024 Developments

Warner Norcross + Judd on

The Keeping Families Together initiative, implemented by the Biden administration on Aug. 19, 2024, allowed certain undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to remain in the U.S. through "Parole in Place,"...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Judge Again Finds DACA Program Illegal, Blocks New Applications, Allows Renewals

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival program (DACA) is not legal, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen has ruled in State of Texas et al. v. U.S. et al. Judge Hanen issued an injunction preventing the Department...more

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP

Federal Courts Reverse And Invalidate Administration Policies Concerning Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals And The Definition...

On Friday, December 4, 2020, a federal judge ordered the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to reopen the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to new applicants for the first time since 2017. This...more

Fisher Phillips

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump Administration’s DACA Rollback, But Immigration Officials Show No Signs of Compliance

Fisher Phillips on

A federal judge recently struck down the Trump administration’s recent efforts to significantly restrict the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides protection from deportation for approximately...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Improper Appointment Of Acting DHS Head Invalidates Rollback Of DACA Program, Court Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Federal District Judge Nicolas G. Garaufis struck down the Administration’s most recent attempt to limit the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. He held that the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Chad...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

DACA Litigation Update

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On June 18, 2020, when the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration had not properly terminated the Delayed Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, many (including Dreamers themselves) assumed that at least for...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Dreamers Face DACA Reboot

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In light of the recent Supreme Court decision, DHS continues the DACA program, but implements new guidance as it conducts a complete review of the program....more

Epstein Becker & Green

August 2020 Immigration Alert

Epstein Becker & Green on

USCIS Will Increase Filing Fees as of October 2, 2020 - On July 31, 2020, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”) announced it will increase filing fees effective October 2, 2020. The fee increases will...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

DHS Limits Scope of DACA - No New Applications, Restrictions on Advance Parole, Shortened Renewals

On July 28, 2020, only six weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States blocked the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, DHS issued a...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Current Beneficiaries May Renew DACA Status While Program Undergoes Review, Administration Announces

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In response to the June 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that the DACA program had not been properly terminated by the Trump Administration, President Donald Trump has announced he will be instituting a comprehensive review...more

Clark Hill PLC

Supreme Court Ruling Could Impact the Future of DACA

Clark Hill PLC on

On June 18, 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration's termination of the Deferred Action for Children Arrivals (DACA) program violated Federal law....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

What Does the Supreme Court DACA Decision Mean for DACA Employers and Employees?

Court Decision - On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) decision in 2017 to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program violated the...more

Dickinson Wright

The DACA Decision – Supreme Court’s Ruling Provides Temporary Uncertain Relief

Dickinson Wright on

The Trump administration has already announced its goal to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy commenced on June 15, 2012 by President Obama within the next six months post the decision of the U.S....more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Blocks DACA Rescission, for Now

Morgan Lewis on

In a landmark 5–4 decision issued June 18, the US Supreme Court held that the Department of Homeland Security’s rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was unlawful agency action....more

Mintz - Immigration Viewpoints

DACA Supreme Court Decision – Further Analysis

As previously reported by Mintz, last week the U.S. Supreme Court upheld three lower court rulings, holding that President Trump’s 2017 move to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was unlawful...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

A Win for Dreamers: Supreme Court Rejects Bid to end DACA

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court allows DACA to proceed on the grounds that DHS did not meet the regulatory Administrative Procedures Act requirements in rescinding the program. The Court did not rule on the legality of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Trump Administration’s Rescission of DACA Was Unlawful

- The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Trump administration did not properly terminate the DACA program under the APA. - The DACA program is restored to its full form, as it existed prior to the rescission in 2017. -...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration’s Attempt to Rescind DACA Protections for Dreamers

On Thursday, June 18, the Supreme Court rejected the Trump Administration’s attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program for undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children, known as...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

DACA Survives: SCOTUS Blocks Trump Administration Bid to End Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program

On June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in DHS v. Regents of the University of California, No. 18-587, effectively blocking the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) attempt to end...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 18, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., No. 18-587; Trump v. NAACP, No. 18-588; Wolf v. Vidal, No. 18-589: In 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood...more

102 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide