News & Analysis as of

Daubert Standards Witnesses

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Defining the Limits of Lay Testimony in Complicated Products Cases

“So when is a question too complicated for the jury?” That is the question the Third Circuit sought to answer recently in Slatowski v. Sig Sauer, Inc., ___ F. 4th ___, 2025 WL 2178533 (3d Cir. 2025), reversing a district...more

Butler Snow LLP

Rule 104(c)(3): When Justice So Requires

Butler Snow LLP on

The following is an article of fiction. The author simply has a well-developed imagination. He should have won summary judgment. And he had – on all claims save one. But one was enough. And now he found himself in...more

Genova Burns LLC

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules Drug Recognition Expert Testimony Admissible Under the Daubert-Accutane Standard

Genova Burns LLC on

On November 15, 2023, the New Jersey Supreme Court released its decision on the much anticipated issue of whether Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) testimony is admissible under New Jersey Rule of Evidence 702. The Court...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Judges, Be the Gatekeepers 702 Needs you to Be

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules of Federal Judicial Conference recently approved several amendments to Fed. R. Evid. 702 intended to quash lackadaisical and flaccid Daubert gatekeeping....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Maryland Adopts Daubert Standard For Admissibility Of Expert Testimony

The Maryland Court of Appeals has retired the inflexible Frye-Reed standard and adopted the framework of Daubert for evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony. In Rochkind v. Stevenson (August 28, 2020), Maryland...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide