News & Analysis as of

Defense Strategies › Causation › Appeals

Adams & Reese

Warning! Clear Labels Lead to Better Defense Protection for Manufacturers, Says Louisiana Supreme Court

Adams & Reese on

A recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision confirmed that clear and express warning labels are a powerful defense for manufacturers against product liability claims under the Louisiana Products Liability Act (LPLA), especially...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

No Causation Defence for Self-Interested Fiduciaries: UK Supreme Court Affirms Strict Profit Rule

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The judgment concerns the circumstances in which fiduciaries must account to their principals for the profits they make from their fiduciary relationships....more

Marshall Dennehey

District Court of Appeals Tell Plaintiffs They ‘Can’t Have Their Cake and Eat It Too’

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: In Mickler v. Triplett, 397 So.3d 188 (Fla. 5th DCA Nov. 15, 2024), the Court of Appeal thwarted a new strategy from the plaintiffs’ bar to remove the causation question from the hands of the jury....more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

New California Evidentiary Standard Makes Admitting Defense Expert Testimony More Challenging

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on

California’s evidentiary rules have changed. As of January 1, 2024, defense expert testimony in medical causation cases is subject to a higher threshold....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide