News & Analysis as of

Do Not Call List Statutory Interpretation Motion to Dismiss

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Do DNC Call Rules Apply to Text Messaging?

On August 26 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida issued a useful decision for companies contesting National Do Not Call (“DNC”) claims. In Davis v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the Court granted...more

Burr & Forman

Another Court Holds Text Messages Not Subject to Do-Not-Call Registry TCPA Claims

Burr & Forman on

Davis v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. 4:24-cv-477-AW-MAF (N.D. Fla. Aug. 26, 2025) - Plaintiff filed a putative class action, claiming that Defendant violated 47 U.S.C. § 227(c)(5) and its implementing regulation, 47 C.F.R. §...more

Troutman Amin LLP

MORE REQUIRED: Court Tosses TCPA DNC Claim Finding Allegation of “Solicitation” Insufficient

Troutman Amin LLP on

The bar for pleading solicitations in TCPA DNC cases may have just been raised a smidge. In Bell v. Hawx Services, 2025 WL 2533371 (E.D. Cal Sept. 3, 2025) a court dismissed a TCPA DNC case finding allegations the calls at...more

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

What Is A “Residential Subscriber” Under The TCPA?

Our readers may recall a piece in which we discussed a recent decision from the United States Supreme Court which more than opened the door to judicial review of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) implementing...more

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Major Decision for Defense Bar: Text Messages Do Not Satisfy DNC Pleading Requirements

On July 21, 2025, the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois issued an important decision for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) defendants. In Jones et al. v. Blackstone Medical Services,...more

Mintz - Technology, Communications & Media...

Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Updates — July 2025

The Sixth Circuit recently delivered a clear message to litigants pursuing claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA): high call volume alone is not enough. In Fluker v. Ally Financial, Inc., the court...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

TCPA Tracker: April-June 2025

On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a district court in an enforcement proceeding is not bound by an agency’s pre-enforcement interpretation of a statute. Rather, as the Court held in McLaughlin Chiropractic...more

Burr & Forman

Utah District Court Holds Real Estate Company Did Not Violate the TCPA by Returning Missed Call

Burr & Forman on

Butera v Sugarhouse Real Estate Group, L.C., No. 2:25cv00014 DAK-DAO, 2025 WL 1798968 (D. Utah June 30, 2025) - Background - Plaintiff, who registered his number on the National Do Not Call registry (“DNC”) in 2015,...more

Troutman Amin LLP

THE DEATH OF PRESUMPTION: Are Cell Phones Still “Residential” Post McLaughlin?

Troutman Amin LLP on

The TCPA landscape is being reshaped in real time and we’re here to bear witness. With the Supreme Court’s decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Assocs. v. McKesson Corp., No. 23-1226, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 2385 (June 20, 2025), the...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

California Federal Court Dismisses TCPA Complaint Finding Recruitment Messages Are Not Solicitations

Troutman Pepper Locke on

In a recent ruling, a U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a complaint brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint alleged that the...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide