News & Analysis as of

Dubin v United States

Frantz Ward LLP

The United States Supreme Court – More Partisan or Principled?

Frantz Ward LLP on

As the United States Supreme Court concluded its most recent term, a flurry of consequential decisions were released.  As is typical, some of the most controversial decisions were released towards the end of the term (which...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Aggravated Identity Theft Law in Healthcare Fraud Case

Holland & Knight LLP on

The healthcare industry is one of the most heavily regulated industries in the United States. Healthcare companies and practitioners devote significant resources to complying with the complex and often changing legal and...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

In a win for defendants, the Supreme Court limits the aggravated identity theft statute and resulting prosecutorial...

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

Federal prosecutors will now be cabined in their ability to use aggravated identity theft charges to pressure defendants to plead guilty to other offenses in exchange for avoiding the two-year mandatory minimum, mandatory...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Supreme Court Cautions Against Overly Broad Criminal Charging Decisions

The U.S. Supreme Court recently struck another blow against overcriminalization of federal criminal statutes, i.e., the application of criminal provisions in specific laws in ways that Congress never intended. The court’s...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Rejects Government's Broad Use of the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute to Impose Two-Year Mandatory Minimum...

King & Spalding on

The aggravated identity theft statute, 18 U.S.C. §1028A, imposes a mandatory two-year sentencing enhancement upon a defendant who “uses” without lawful authority another’s means of identification “during and in relation to”...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Unanimously Reins in the Government’s Use of the Aggravated Identify Theft Statute

In an extremely consequential decision issued last week, the United States Supreme Court reined in what the Court termed the government’s “boundless interpretation” of the aggravated identity theft statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1028A....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Is this “Good-Bye” to the Two Year Mandatory Minimum in Healthcare Fraud Cases?

On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision holding that the aggravated identity theft statute –and its mandatory minimum of two years – is not triggered merely because someone else’s identification...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Voting Rights, Health Care Liability, and Trademark Are the Subjects of the Day – SCOTUS Today

Emerging from the pattern of unanimity, or near unanimity, that has characterized most of the cases decided so far this term, the Supreme Court decided one of its most eagerly awaited and controversial cases. And the outcome...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Dubin v. United States

On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Dubin v. United States, No. 22-10, holding § 1028A(a)(1), aggravated identity theft, is violated when the defendant’s misuse of another person’s means of identification is at...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide