News & Analysis as of

Electronic Communications › Federal Rules of Civil Procedure › Sanctions

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(g) Was Violated by Permitting Client Searches With Minimal Oversight by Counsel

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model on

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(g) is called the “stop and think” rule.  In Grullon v. Lewis, 2025 WL 1693425 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2025), the court found a violation of that rule....more

BakerHostetler

Antitrust Sanctions: The Duty to Preserve Chats

BakerHostetler on

On August 5, 2024, District Judge Amit P. Mehta (U.S. District Court, District of Columbia) ruled in United States v. Google LLC that Google violated §2 of the Sherman Act by monopolizing the internet search engine market....more

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model

Failure to Show “Intent to Deprive” Leads to Denial of Rule 37(e)(2) Sanctions

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model on

A motion for spoliation sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(e) was denied in Boshea v. Compass Marketing, Inc., 2024 WL 811468 (D. Md. Feb. 27, 2024). The motion was argued and decided during trial. The suit by a former...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Default Judgment Sanction Against Defendants for Failure to Produce Slack Messages

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on

In Red Wolf Energy Trading, LLC v. BIA Capital Management, LLC, Gregory V. Moeller, Growthworks, LLC, Michael Harradon, and Jon Moeller, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered a default...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide