News & Analysis as of

Eminent Domain Property Owners Supreme Court of the United States

Downey Brand LLP

Ideker, USACE’s New Guidance, and Figuring Out How to do an Induced Flooding Analysis

Downey Brand LLP on

On July 28, 2025, the Director of Civil Works for the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Eddie Belk, issued guidance for analyzing induced flooding. This guidance is intended to help USACE Districts and Divisions...more

Ackerman & Ackerman, P.C.

How to Make “Just Compensation” More “Just” for Displaced Homeowners

Last summer, I wrote a blog about why just compensation—which is based on the ‘objective’ standard of what a property would sell for on the open market—shortchanges residential property owners subjected to eminent domain. In...more

Roetzel & Andress

U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Expands Its Controversial 2005 Kelo Decision

Roetzel & Andress on

The U.S. Supreme Court often makes headlines with its decisions, but even in its inaction, the Court can have an impact on the law. Such was the case with Eychaner v. The City of Chicago, which the Court declined to hear last...more

Nossaman LLP

Property Owners Cannot Remove State Court Eminent Domain Actions to Federal Court

Nossaman LLP on

Last year, the United States Supreme Court made headlines (at least in our eminent domain world) by issuing a ruling in Knick v. Township of Scott that property owners can bypass the state courts and directly file a Fifth...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

SCOTUS Rehears Eminent Domain Case With Kavanaugh On Bench

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The US Supreme Court reheard oral arguments on whether a property owner can have a federal court decide an inverse condemnation case without first exhausting state remedies. In Knick v. Twp. of Scott, the property owner...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

SCOTUS Will Not Hear FL Eminent Domain Case

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition to hear a developer’s case against the Florida Department of Environmental Protection over a permit denial for a beachfront parcel. The case relates to a DEP denial of a final permit...more

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining the Property Affected by a Regulatory Taking

The Supreme Court of the United States recently decided the case Murr v. Wisconsin, No. 15-214 (June 23, 2017), which laid out a new test for determining whether separate parcels of land should be evaluated as a single parcel...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation from regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation for regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide