News & Analysis as of

Employer Liability Issues › Protected Class › Religious Discrimination

Meyers Nave

Ninth Circuit Rules on Caste as a Protected Class in CSU’s Anti-Discrimination Policy

Meyers Nave on

On March 12, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Kumar v. Koester, dismissing a constitutional challenge to a university’s anti-discrimination policy that added “caste” as a protected class. Effective January 1,...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

New York Appellate Division Permits Worker to Establish Membership in Protected Class Based on Association with Another

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

Chiara v. Town of New Castle, (N.Y. App. Div., 2d Dep’t Jan. 14, 2015): A recent decision by the New York Appellate Division, Second Department, held that a plaintiff claiming religious discrimination under the New York State...more

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits...

Employers: Don’t Forget About the Possibility of Associational Discrimination Liability

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits... on

A case out of a New York State appeals court should remind employers that they may liable for discrimination where they take an adverse action against an employee based on the employee’s association with someone in a...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Appellate Division Panel Issues Ruling Broadly Interpreting New York State Human Rights Law

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On January 14, 2015, in a case of first impression, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department held that an employee can sufficiently demonstrate his membership in a protected class by virtue of his...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide