News & Analysis as of

Employment Litigation Corporate Officers

Hogan Lovells

Gilbert v. Unisys: The Court of Chancery grants advancement to unelected officers

Hogan Lovells on

In Gilbert v. Unisys Corp., the Delaware Court of Chancery held that two former employees with the title of Vice President were entitled to advancement of litigation expenses brought by the corporation, despite the fact that...more

Morris James LLP

Chancery Finds that Former Employees were “Officers” Entitled to Advancement

Morris James LLP on

Gilbert v. Unisys Corp., C.A. No. 2023-0513-PAF (Del. Ch. Aug. 13, 2024) - In this decision, the Court of Chancery held that the plaintiffs were entitled to advancement of legal fees and expenses from their former...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Indiana Appeals Court Rejects Noncompete That Prevented Work in Any Capacity

On November 25, 2024, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that a former chief operating officer (COO) at a medical fee collection company did not breach noncompete agreements and a nondisclosure provision when she took a job...more

Allen Matkins

Why You May Not Want To Be A "Guiding Spirit"

Allen Matkins on

Last week, I wrote about California Labor Code § 558.1 which provides that an owner, director, officer, or managing agent of an employer (a "person acting on behalf of an employer") may be liable "as the employer" for...more

Genova Burns LLC

New Jersey Federal Court Forces a Software Company to Confront the Question at Trial: Did Your Employee Quit or Was He Fired?

Genova Burns LLC on

On May 23, 2019, the New Jersey District Court in Kunal Shah v. Meditab Software, Inc. refused to dismiss the retaliation claim of a software company’s former Chief Executive Officer, even though he notified the company of...more

Mintz - Bankruptcy & Restructuring Viewpoints

In Massachusetts, Directors and Investors Acting in their Normal Capacities Do Not Have Personal Liability for Wage Act Violations

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently held that the Massachusetts Wage Act does not impose personal liability on board members or investors acting in their normal capacities. In Segal v. Genitrix, LLC, the SJC...more

Littler

Massachusetts High Court Rules that Investors and Board Members are not Personally Liable for Unpaid Wages Under State Law

Littler on

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently held that individuals acting as board members and investors cannot be held personally liable under the Massachusetts Payment of Wages Law, M.G.L. c. 149, § 148, for a...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Company Investors And Board Members Off The Hook For Unpaid Wages In Massachusetts

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In an important decision, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court clarified the scope of personal liability for unpaid wages under the Massachusetts Wage Act. The SJC held that board members and directors...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide