News & Analysis as of

Energy Projects Regulatory Authority Oil & Gas

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment - Oil and Gas Commission: Saltwerx, LLC Lithium Compensation Structure Approved

The Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment - Oil and Gas Commission (“Commission”) addressed an application for the establishment of a lithium compensation structure for Saltwerx, LLC (“Saltwerx”)....more

Latham & Watkins LLP

EPA Proposes Granting Texas Primacy for Class VI Wells

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The proposal could accelerate the permitting process for carbon capture and storage projects in the state. On June 9, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a proposed rule that, if approved, would...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Texas Progresses Toward CCS Primacy

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

This week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took the penultimate step to granting Texas the authority to directly issue Class VI permits under the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Underground Injection Control (UIC)...more

Downey Brand LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Use of Environmental Review as a Roadblock

Downey Brand LLP on

On May 29, 2025, in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado (2025) 605 U.S. ____, the Supreme Court gave instruction that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “is a procedural cross-check, not...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Carbon Sequestration Advances in Texas as EPA Proposes to Grant Class VI Primacy

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

On June 9, 2025, EPA issued a prepublication version of the proposed rule granting Class VI underground injection control (“UIC”) primary enforcement authority (“primacy”) to Texas. Class VI UIC wells are used for the...more

DLA Piper

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Top Points

DLA Piper on

Supreme Court aims to provide predictability by narrowing the scope of NEPA review - The Supreme Court’s latest ruling in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County marks a significant “course correction” in how...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

SCOTUS Unanimously Limits Scope of NEPA in Major Infrastructure Ruling

Quarles & Brady LLP on

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition et al. v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al. The U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the scope of federal agency review requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)...more

Stoel Rives - Environmental Law Blog

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Agencies Granted Substantial Deference in Assessing Project Scope and...

In a significant decision interpreting the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado on May 29, 2025. For certain...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS Reins in NEPA Scope in Seven County

McGlinchey Stafford on

In a landmark ruling issued May 29, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the D.C. Circuit in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, sharply limiting the scope of environmental review...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

SCOTUS Limits Scope of NEPA Reviews, Reinstates Approval of Uinta Basin Railway

In a highly anticipated decision for project developers and permitting agencies, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit’s 2023 decision that had invalidated federal approval of the Uinta Basin Railway. In Seven...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Issues “Course-Correcting” NEPA Decision

Perkins Coie on

The Supreme Court of the United States’ opinion, issued May 29, 2025, in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, reaffirms the Court’s earlier, seminal decisions expounding judicial review under the...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Pruning NEPA’s Branches: The Supreme Court Reshapes Environmental Reviews for Major Actions

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Over the last half century, federal courts have interpreted the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to require federal agencies to study an ever-growing range of indirect effects and impacts when approving large...more

Jenner & Block

Supreme Court Limits Scope of NEPA’s Analysis of Upstream and Downstream Environmental Impacts of Federal Actions

Jenner & Block on

On May 29, 2025, in a 8-0 ruling (Justice Gorsuch recused himself from the case), the Supreme Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit erred in requiring federal regulators to evaluate the potential...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Review Under NEPA

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The decision emphasizes the importance of judicial deference to agencies on NEPA and narrows the scope of environmental analyses....more

Latham & Watkins LLP

EPA Proposes Granting Arizona Primacy for All Classes of Injection Wells

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The proposal could accelerate the permitting process for projects in the state, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects....more

Troutman Pepper Locke

D.C. Circuit Denies Healthy Gulf’s and Sierra Club’s Petition for Review of FERC Order Authorizing Construction and Operation of...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On March 28, 2025, the D.C. Circuit denied a joint petition for review brought by Healthy Gulf and Sierra Club (together, “Petitioners”) challenging FERC’s grant of a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

D.C. Circuit Upholds FERC Order Requiring Stingray to Restore Service Before Abandoning Damaged Pipeline

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On December 20, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”) upheld FERC’s order authorizing Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“Stingray”) to abandon a portion of its...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Disponen alivios a las modificaciones de FPO de proyectos de energía en Colombia

Holland & Knight LLP on

El Ministerio de Minas y Energía (MME) en Colombia publicó el 2 de febrero de 2024, la Resolución 40042 por medio del cual se adoptaron medidas de carácter definitivas para otorgar alivios a los proyectos de generación,...more

Hicks Johnson

Oklahoma Oil and Gas Business Braces for Change in Wake of Supreme Court Decision

Hicks Johnson on

On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma, ruling that most of the eastern half of Oklahoma is an Indian reservation. While the decision ostensibly resolves a jurisdictional challenge to a...more

Stoel Rives LLP

EPA's New Section 401 Guidance: Will It Limit States' Authority or Just Make Them Mad?

Stoel Rives LLP on

Frustrated by some states’ use of their Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401 authority to oppose or delay energy projects—particularly the transportation of fossil fuels—the Trump Administration last Friday issued the second...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Why EPA’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Guidance Will Have No Practical Impact on Pipeline Projects

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced the rollout of its new Clean Water Act Section 401 Guidance for Federal Agencies, States and Authorized Tribes which replaces an April 2010 Interim Guidance...more

21 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide