News & Analysis as of

Environmental Policies › Environmental Litigation › Mitigated Negative Declaration

Snell & Wilmer

You can’t be too careful documenting compliance with AB 52’s tribal consultation requirements.

Snell & Wilmer on

A recent decision from the California Court of Appeal demonstrates the importance of strictly following the tribal consultation requirements of Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52). ...more

Meyers Nave

Court of Appeal Confirms (Again) that CEQA Statute of Limitations Runs from the First Project Approval

Meyers Nave on

The Second District Court of Appeal confirmed again that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) favors finality in rejecting a challenge to a subsequent project approval for a 42-single family home project in Los...more

Perkins Coie

CEQA Year in Review 2019

Perkins Coie on

A Summary of Published Appellate Opinions Under the California Environmental Quality Act - The year 2019 saw several trailblazing opinions, indicating that courts continue to grapple with some of CEQA’s core policies. The...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Court Decision Creates Conflicting Case Law with Respect to When to Challenge a SEQRA Final Determination

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The Appellate Division, Second Department, recently issued a decision that appears to be a departure from prior precedent and is certain to create confusion with respect to when to commence an Article 78 claim challenging a...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide