Evidence, Discovery, Rule of Evidence 702

Court Affirms Admissibility of DTI-Based TBI Diagnosis in Oklahoma Federal Case

Stark & Stark on 4/16/2025

In a significant decision for plaintiffs litigating traumatic brain injury (TBI) claims, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma has denied a defense motion to exclude expert testimony based on diffusion...more

New Trial Granted Because “Nearly All” of the Defendant’s Noninfringement Evidence Was Untimely

Knobbe Martens on 2/14/2025

The district court erred by admitting untimely expert testimony on noninfringement and by refusing to grant a new trial after the jury found noninfringement. Trudell Medical International (“Trudell”) sued D R Burton...more

To Depose or Not to Depose: When Challenging Opposing Nonretained Experts Becomes Challenging

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on 12/16/2024

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) requires parties to disclose the opinions of experts who may present evidence at trial. If the disclosures are inadequate, Rule 37(c) requires exclusion of the opinions “unless the...more

With the Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Amendment in Place, Federal Courts Issue Rulings in Conformity with the Changes, and...

Benesch on 7/1/2024

It has now been over six months since the amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 regarding the admissibility of expert testimony went into effect on Dec. 1, 2023....more

Evidence › Discovery › Rule of Evidence 702

Court Affirms Admissibility of DTI-Based TBI Diagnosis in Oklahoma Federal Case

New Trial Granted Because “Nearly All” of the Defendant’s Noninfringement Evidence Was Untimely

To Depose or Not to Depose: When Challenging Opposing Nonretained Experts Becomes Challenging

With the Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Amendment in Place, Federal Courts Issue Rulings in Conformity with the Changes, and...

It’s not what happened, but why: First Circuit rejects conclusory, unsupported expert opinions

Non-Expert Testimony on Obviousness Is Inadmissible

Is the Frye Standard Making a Comeback in Florida?

Evidence › Discovery › Rule of Evidence 702

Court Affirms Admissibility of DTI-Based TBI Diagnosis in Oklahoma Federal Case

New Trial Granted Because “Nearly All” of the Defendant’s Noninfringement Evidence Was Untimely

To Depose or Not to Depose: When Challenging Opposing Nonretained Experts Becomes Challenging

With the Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Amendment in Place, Federal Courts Issue Rulings in Conformity with the Changes, and...

It’s not what happened, but why: First Circuit rejects conclusory, unsupported expert opinions

Non-Expert Testimony on Obviousness Is Inadmissible

Is the Frye Standard Making a Comeback in Florida?

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"