News & Analysis as of

Evidence › Expert Testimony › Occupational Exposure

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Double Take: Fifth Circuit’s Dual BELO Rulings Show Both General and Specific Causation Are Essential

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

We previously blogged about a decision in the In re Deepwater Horizon BELO litigation – Ruffin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. – in which the Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants in an alleged chemical...more

Goldberg Segalla

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Granted Based on Expert Preclusion

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - Plaintiff Scott Keller alleged that he was exposed to asbestos during his employment on ExxonMobil Oil Company vessels and that he developed...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Texas Court Upholds Summary Judgment in Silica Case

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment for Exxon Mobil corporation in Stanley Cole v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (No. 14-22-00756-CV), a premises liability case involving alleged exposure to olivine dust. The...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Foundation, Not Façade — The Fifth Circuit Affirms the Proper Basis Requirement for Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Newsome v....

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

In a toxic tort case, plaintiffs must establish general causation. If a substance is incapable of causing the type of injury plaintiff claims, then it certainly didn’t cause theirs. Under Texas law, toxic tort plaintiffs must...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide