News & Analysis as of

Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Corporate Counsel Article III

BCLP

Eleventh Circuit Weeds Out Plaintiffs Who “Manufacture” Article III Standing With Self-Inflicted Harm

BCLP on

On July 18, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the notion that plaintiffs can “manufacture” Article III standing by identifying “self-inflicted harm” such as “expenditure of money and wasted time to correct an otherwise...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 11, 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there is no publication to a third party — and therefore no Article III standing under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) — where the recipient of a...more

Goodwin

2023 Year in Review: Major U.S. Supreme Court and Appellate Cases

Goodwin on

Welcome to the Major US Supreme Court and Appellate Cases chapter of our annual report Consumer Financial Services 2023 Year in Review. Looking Ahead to 2024 - The Supreme Court continues to take a close look at major...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Key Takeaways From the New Onslaught of FCRA Filings

Troutman Pepper Locke on

Following an unprecedented year, lawsuits under the Fair Credit Reporting Act continue to be filed with ever-increasing frequency and consequence. Originally published in Law360 on January 28, 2022. ...more

BCLP

District Court Says Supreme Court Ruling on Standing in Class Actions Does Not Apply to Privacy Claims

BCLP on

On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued an important decision on Article III standing in class actions that will have a significant impact on the way class actions are certified - and will likely scuttle numerous ...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

FCRA Year in Review: Key FCRA Appellate Decisions

Hudson Cook, LLP on

[co-author: David Anthony] In 2020, the appellate courts had numerous opportunities to weigh in on many unanswered questions that remain in litigation after over 50 years since the statute was first enacted. The case law...more

Fisher Phillips

June 2021: The Top 19 Labor And Employment Law Stories

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years—and this past month...more

Blank Rome LLP

How SCOTUS Clarified the Spokeo Standard of “Concrete” Harm Necessary to Establish Article III Standing, and What It Means for the...

Blank Rome LLP on

On June 25, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297, 2021 WL 2599472 (U.S. June 25, 2021) (“TransUnion”), providing much needed clarity regarding the type of...more

Mintz - Privacy & Cybersecurity Viewpoints

The U.S. Supreme Court Raises the Bar on Standing in Privacy and Data Breach Class Actions

On Friday, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling, which significantly impacts the plaintiffs’ ability to pursue privacy and data breach class actions in federal courts. In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, Case No....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Paves The Way For More State Court Class Actions About Federal Statutes

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In reemphasizing the “concrete harm” requirement for Article III standing, the Supreme Court may have raised the hurdle to federal court but exposed defendants to more state court suits...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

In Significant Check on Federal Consumer Class Actions, U.S. Supreme Court Holds "No Harm, No Foul"

On Friday, June 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, reversed and remanded TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez back to the Ninth Circuit. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court and he was joined by...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Class Members Who Suffer No Concrete Harm From Statutory Violations Do Not Have Article III Standing...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: On June 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297 (U.S. June 25, 2021). The Supreme Court held that the vast majority of...more

Proskauer - New Media & Technology

Some Interesting CDA Section 230 Developments: A Novel FCRA Victory, a Negligent Design Exception and a Startling New State Law

In the past month, there have been some notable developments surrounding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA” or “Section 230”) beyond the ongoing debate in Congress over the potential for legislative reform....more

Bilzin Sumberg

With Supreme Court Privacy Case Pending, Silicon Valley Weighs In

Bilzin Sumberg on

On March 30, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez. This case marks the first time the Court will address the residual question in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins — what about...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Supreme Court to Address Article III Standing Requirements of Absent Class Members

In a significant case for class action litigants, the Supreme Court is expected to resolve a circuit split over the standing requirements applicable to absent class members, and weigh in on the circumstances – if any – under...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U. S. Supreme Court to Consider Article III Standing for Absent Class Members in Review of Ninth Circuit Decision

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has again granted a petition to examine standing in the context of class actions, specifically whether Article III of the Constitution permits members of a certified class to recover money...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS agrees to review FCRA class action judgment where most class members suffered no actual injury

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to review a $40 million class action trial judgment for statutory and punitive damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and its forthcoming decision later this Term will likely be...more

Littler

Ninth Circuit Rules Only Named Plaintiff Must Have Article III Standing For Class Certification

Littler on

In Ramirez v. Trans Union, the Ninth Circuit addressed whether, at the class certification stage of a putative class case, only the named plaintiff or all class members must have Article III standing (i.e., a concrete injury...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Seventh Circuit Allies With FCRA Class Action Plaintiffs on Spokeo Grounds.

McGuireWoods LLP on

On August 29, the Seventh Circuit reentered the multi-front fray that has broken out among lower courts in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Spokeo v Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016). ...more

Littler

Third Circuit Holds Individual Plaintiffs Lack Standing for Some Alleged Violations of the FCRA's Pre-Adverse Action Notice...

Littler on

On September 10, 2018, in Long v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit joined the chorus of recent circuit court opinions tackling the question of...more

Goodwin

Applying Spokeo, 6th Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Suit

Goodwin on

On February 16, 2018, the 6th Circuit, in Hagy v. Demers & Adams (882 F.3d 616 (6th Cir. Feb. 16, 2018)), found that a former borrower did not have standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Ninth Circuit: Speculative Injuries Do Not Confer Article III Standing

As Dwight Schrute of hit NBC show “The Office” said, “identity theft is not a joke, Jim! Millions of families suffer every year!” In response, Congress has passed a variety of legislation over the years aimed at curbing...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Spokeo v. Robins: The U.S. Supreme Court Declines An Encore Performance

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In deciding to deny certiorari to review Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 17-806 (U.S. 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to reconsider the standing principles it announced in its landmark 2016 Spokeo...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

California Federal Court Strikes Down FCRA Claim

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Earlier this month, in a case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Home Depot avoided a class action suit under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The lawsuit accused the company of...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

District Court Dismisses Putative FCRA Class Action For Lack Of Standing

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently dismissed a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), finding that the named plaintiff lacked standing to...more

52 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide