News & Analysis as of

Federal Arbitration Act Motion to Vacate Jurisdiction

The Federal Arbitration Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 1925 that governs arbitration in contracts implicating interstate commerce. The Act applies in both federal and state courts. 
Carlton Fields

Fourth Circuit Holds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Consider Petition to Vacate

Carlton Fields on

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that it lacked jurisdiction over a petition to vacate an arbitration award....more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Establishing Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Post-Award Motions in Federal Court: Split Deepens as Fifth Circuit Joins Three...

As discussed in earlier posts, the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., does not itself provide an independent basis for subject matter jurisdiction over federal court proceedings concerning domestic...more

Burr & Forman

Fifth Circuit Finds Jurisdiction Over Post-Award Proceedings Under FAA

Burr & Forman on

While the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not provide federal subject matter jurisdiction, federal courts may nevertheless have jurisdiction over proceedings to compel arbitration if the underlying claim is “predicated...more

Carlton Fields

Federal District Court Declines to Rule on Arbitration Award, Finding No Independent Basis for Jurisdiction

Carlton Fields on

Following arbitration, the parties filed cross-motions to confirm and vacate the arbitration award. The District Court for the Southern District of California issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed...more

Carlton Fields

Minnesota Federal Mutual Court Adopts “Look Through” Basis For Federal Question Jurisdiction In FAA Section 9 Disputes

Carlton Fields on

The District of Minnesota issued several opinions this summer in a dispute between two insurance companies, Federated Mutual Insurance Co. (“Federated Mutual”) and Federated National Holding Co. (“Federated National”),...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Only in America: The Controversy Concerning Federal Jurisdiction Over Motions to Confirm, Vacate, or Modify Arbitral Awards

In most countries, it is uncontroversial that a court sitting at the situs of an arbitration has jurisdiction to adjudicate a petition to confirm or vacate or modify an award issued in that arbitration. In the United States...more

Carlton Fields

First Circuit Affirms District Court’s Confirmation Of Arbitration Award Under The “Look-Through” Test

Carlton Fields on

The background of this matter could be found here. In sum, Plaintiffs Dr. Luis Ortiz-Espinosa and his wife Maritza Soto-Garcia, the conjugal partnership they formed, Espinosa-Soto, and Luis Ortiz-Espinosa, as trustee of...more

Carlton Fields

Court Applies The “Look Through” Approach To FAA Section 10 Petitions In Determining Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Carlton Fields on

Plaintiffs, members of the Harman family, sold their family farm and sought investment advice from defendant Wilson-Davis. The Harmans claimed they were damaged after making certain investments due to forged financial...more

Carlton Fields

Court Dismisses Challenge Of FINRA Arbitration Award For Lack Of Jurisdiction

Carlton Fields on

In a case involving a FINRA arbitration between investors and their financial advisor, Judge Anita S. Brody of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that she did not have the...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide