News & Analysis as of

Federal Court Litigation

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

District court dismisses CFPB claims against credit reporting agency as time-barred, but grants leave to amend

On August 6, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted a credit reporting agency’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend in a case brought by the CFPB. The court found that CFPB’s claims for...more

ArentFox Schiff

How New Restrictions on Universal Injunctions Could Change Litigation Strategies

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 27, the US Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Trump v. Casa, clarifying the limits of federal district courts’ authority to issue broad, so-called “universal” injunctions against the federal government....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Federal Court Vacates Federal Reserve’s Interchange Fee Rule

On August 6, the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota vacated the Federal Reserve’s 2011 Regulation II interchange fee cap rule, finding that the rule allegedly exceeded the FRB’s authority under the Durbin...more

Stevens & Lee

Not So Fast: Enforcing an Appellate Decision Requires the Appellate Court’s Mandate or Remand

Stevens & Lee on

Here is a typical scenario. You appeal your case to a federal or state appellate court. The briefing is done and dusted. The case is argued. Everyone is patiently waiting for the appellate court’s decision. Then — voila — the...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Removal? Snap to it!

The forum defendant rule normally bars removing a state case to federal court when there is a forum defendant, even if the parties are otherwise diverse. A rarely-used method is the exception to this rule. Using a procedure...more

Lathrop GPM

FTC Voluntarily Dismisses Recently Filed Suit Against PepsiCo for Illegal Price Discrimination

Lathrop GPM on

On May 22, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voluntarily dismissed its case against PepsiCo alleging price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Federal Trade Commission v. PepsiCo, Inc.,...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Federal Court of Appeal Dismisses Class Action Certification Due To Unavoidable Individualized Inquiries

Bennett Jones LLP on

In Voltage Pictures v Robert Salna, 2025 FCA 131, the Federal Court of Appeal addressed the preferable procedure criterion in the context of a defendants’ class proceeding. The plaintiffs sought to certify an action against a...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Hospice Insights Podcast - Hospice Audit Updates: Hospices Fare Well in Federal Court

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Increasing audit activity combined with certain decreasingly favorable audit appeal outcomes has resulted in hospices appealing audit results beyond the administrative law judge phase and into federal court. In this episode,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Florida’s CHOICE Act Enacted: Helping Employers Read Between the Lines of the New Non-Compete Law

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Florida’s CHOICE Act, short for “Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth” (CHOICE), is now law. For details of the Act, see Florida’s CHOICE Act Offers Employers Unprecedented Tools...more

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

Civil Practitioner’s Guide to D.R.I. Local Practice

This article serves as a guide for Civil Practitioners when litigating in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. In so doing, it outlines the notable Local Rules regarding: 1) Motions; 2)...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

Federal Court Flags Stark and Anti-Kickback Risks in Physician Pay, Spotlights FCA Constitutional Questions on Appeal

On July 28, the federal district court in the Southern District of Ohio issued a pair of orders in related whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act (FCA): United States ex rel. Murphy v. TriHealth, Inc., et al., No....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Federal Court Vacates 2024 HIPAA Reproductive Health Privacy Rule: Key Impacts for Covered Entities and NPP Compliance

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On June 18, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a decision in Carmen Purl, et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., vacating nearly all of the 2024 HIPAA...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Suluki Secrets: Behind the Scenes of Reasonable Investigations — FCRA Focus Podcast

Troutman Pepper Locke on

In this episode of FCRA Focus, host Dave Gettings is joined by Brooke Conkle and Mandi Blackmon to explore the intricacies of a furnisher's reasonable investigation under Section 1681s-2(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act...more

Fishman Haygood LLP

U.S. Sixth Circuit, En Banc, Reverses GM Transmission Certification on Commonality and Predominance Grounds

Fishman Haygood LLP on

In a previous JD Supra article, I wrote about the Sixth Circuit Court’s initial decision, which upheld class certification for the matter despite GM’s challenges to Article III and predominance, in the case of Speerly v....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Texas Judge Strikes Down HIPAA’s Reproductive Health Amendment

Epstein Becker & Green on

Last month, Judge Matthew Kaszmaryk of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, in Purl v. United Stated Department of Health and Human Services, No. 2:24-cv-00228-Z (N.D. Tex Jun. 18, 2025) struck down nearly all...more

ArentFox Schiff

Associations Can Continue Winning Nationwide Injunctions After Supreme Court Ruling

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Supreme Court’s recent decision in CASA v. Trump, 606 US ___ (June 27, 2025), sharply limited the ability of individual plaintiffs to obtain nationwide injunctions....more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Chanel's Legal Victory Sends a Clear Message: Authenticity Isn't Just a Luxury — It's the Law - The Katten Kattwalk | Issue 29

"Hard times arouse an instinctive desire for authenticity," Coco Chanel once said. Chanel, the eponymous company, has taken this motto to heart in its unwavering commitment to protecting its intellectual property — an effort...more

Woodruff Sawyer

Enforcement of the HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule Vacated Nationwide

Woodruff Sawyer on

On June 18, 2025, a federal district court in Texas vacated a significant portion of the HIPAA Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy (“Final Rule”), which was implemented on April 24, 2024, on a nationwide...more

Bennett Jones LLP

AI in Canada: The Latest from Regulators, Courts and Public Bodies

Bennett Jones LLP on

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized industries, including the legal field. However, with its benefits come challenges, one of which is "AI hallucinations", which refer to instances where an AI system...more

Cozen O'Connor

AGs Hold Fire as ATF Agrees to Keep FRTs Out of Their States

Cozen O'Connor on

A group of 16 Democratic AGs withdrew their motion for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit challenging a decision by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to redistribute thousands of previously...more

Perkins Coie

Arizona Federal Court Scrutinizes Reversionary Clauses in FLSA Class Action Settlements

Perkins Coie on

The federal district court in Arizona recently confirmed that employers need a compelling reason to include reversionary clauses in wage-and-hour class action settlements. In Kostov v. Maricopa County Special Health Care...more

Bailey & Glasser, LLP

First in Class: New Hampshire Federal Court First to Wade Into Nationwide Birthright Citizenship Class Action

Bailey & Glasser, LLP on

On Thursday, July 10, a federal court in New Hampshire issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration, blocking the executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship rights....more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Federal Judge Blocks Implementation of EO on Birthright Citizenship in Class Action Case

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

A federal district court in New Hampshire granted certification to a nationwide class and issued a preliminary injunction (PI) on July 10 that prevents the U.S. government from implementing Executive Order 14160. EO 14160...more

Snell & Wilmer

Northern District of California Underscores Futility of Certain CIPA “Trap and Trace” Class Actions

Snell & Wilmer on

The Northern District of California recently dismissed, with prejudice, a purported class action against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (Royal Caribbean), alleging a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)...more

Polsinelli

EKRA Gets Teeth: Ninth Circuit Strengthens EKRA Enforcement in Schena Ruling

Polsinelli on

Key Takeaways - First Appellate Interpretation of EKRA: The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Schena marks the first appellate court interpretation of the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA), affirming...more

117 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide