News & Analysis as of

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) › Contract Termination

Blank Rome LLP

[Webinar] 180 Days of the Trump Administration—Quick Hits on Executive Orders, Actions, and Policies - July 17th - August 13th,...

Blank Rome LLP on

Blank Rome presents a new summer webinar series where our interdisciplinary team will unpack the most pressing legal, regulatory, and policy developments from the Trump Administration’s first 180 days. Each session offers...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer on

A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Termination of Merger Agreement Based on Material Adverse Effect

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

In Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corporation, the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected an attempt by Boston Scientific to terminate and thus avoid consummating a merger agreement with Channel on the grounds...more

A&O Shearman

Delaware Court Of Chancery Orders Acquiror To Consummate Merger Finding That Misrepresentations Did Not Amount To A Material...

A&O Shearman on

On December 18, 2019, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that defendant Boston Scientific Corporation was not entitled to terminate its merger agreement with plaintiff Channel Medsystems,...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Delaware Reaffirms High Bar for Establishing a Material Adverse Effect

Fenwick & West LLP on

In the first case following Akorn v. Fresenius to rule on a party’s entitlement to terminate a merger agreement on the basis of a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery ordered Boston Scientific...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: MAEjor Ruling: Delaware Court of Chancery Finds Target Suffers Material Adverse Effect and Acquirer Could Back Out of...

Cooley LLP on

M&A practitioners have long advised boards of directors that the Delaware courts have never found that the events or circumstances in a particular transaction met the contractual standard of having a material adverse effect...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

M&A Update: Akorn Falls Far from the Tree: Delaware Chancery Court Finds a “Material Adverse Effect” for the First Time in Akorn,...

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

On October 1, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery found in Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, et al. that Fresenius was entitled to terminate its merger agreement with Akorn. ...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Akorn v. Fresenius: Important Practical Lessons from First-Ever Material Adverse Effect

Fenwick & West LLP on

On October 1, in Akorn v. Fresenius Kabi, the Delaware Court of Chancery for the first time found that a material adverse effect — or MAE — had occurred in a merger transaction, which, combined with other breaches of the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Analyzing Akorn: Delaware’s First M&A Termination Under Material Adverse Effect

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On October 1, 2018, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 246-page post-trial opinion in Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, C.A. No. 2018-0300-JTL, that denied the seller’s (Akorn) request...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

MAE is MIA No Longer: Delaware Court Upholds Use of “Material Adverse Event” Clause for the First Time

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, the Delaware Chancery Court held that Fresenius, a German pharmaceutical company, was justified in invoking a “material adverse event” (MAE) clause to terminate its $4.8 billion merger...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Delaware Judge Finds Elusive MAC—Does It Change Anything?

Bennett Jones LLP on

Purchasers of businesses often want an "escape hatch" prior to closing if the target business suffers a "material adverse change" (or a "material adverse effect"). Historically, based on court decisions primarily out of the...more

A&O Shearman

Delaware Court Of Chancery Rules For The First Time That MAE Justifies Termination Of Deal

A&O Shearman on

In a first-of-its-kind ruling, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled post-trial that Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA (“Fresenius”) properly terminated its $4.3 billion agreement to acquire Akorn,...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Delaware Court of Chancery Finds a Material Adverse Effect and Permits Termination of Merger Agreement

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

In a 246-page post-trial decision issued this week, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that a buyer could terminate a $4.75 billion public company acquisition because of material adverse effects that had occurred at the...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide