News & Analysis as of

Forum Selection CA Supreme Court

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

California Supreme Court Confirms General Enforceability of Delaware Court of Chancery Forum Selection Clauses

Forum selection clauses have long been a feature of commercial contracting. Since then-Chancellor Strine’s decision in Boilermakers Local 154 Ret. Fund v. Chevron Corp., Delaware corporations have routinely included such...more

Clark Hill PLC

California Supreme Court strengthens forum selection clause enforcement

Clark Hill PLC on

The California Supreme Court’s July 21 decision in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court resolves a longstanding uncertainty around enforcement of forum selection clauses under California law, holding that the absence of jury...more

Snell & Wilmer

California Supreme Court Resolves Long-Running Dispute Over Delaware Forum Selection Clauses

Snell & Wilmer on

In a closely watched decision issued on July 21, 2025, the California Supreme Court, in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court, held that a forum selection clause requiring shareholder lawsuits to be brought in the Delaware Court...more

Fenwick & West LLP

California Supreme Court Upholds Delaware Forum Selection Clause

Fenwick & West LLP on

On July 21, 2025, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego County, overturning the lower courts’ decision to decline enforcement of a forum selection clause requiring...more

Goodwin

California Supreme Court Delivers Major Win for Delaware Forum-Selection Clauses

Goodwin on

On July 21, 2025, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego County, which held that an exclusive forum-selection clause designating a forum where a civil jury trial would...more

Allen Matkins

Court Finds Forum Selection Clause That Includes Jury Trial Waiver To Be Unenforceable

Allen Matkins on

California courts will generally give effect to a mandatory forum selection clause unless enforcement would be unreasonable or unfair, and the party opposing enforcement of the clause ordinarily bears the burden of proving...more

Holland & Knight LLP

SCOTUS Continues to Limit the Exercise of Specific Personal Jurisdiction

Holland & Knight LLP on

Three years after its decision in Walden v. Fiore, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another decision that continues its trend of limiting the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendants. In...more

Allen Matkins

Dismissal Based On Forum Non Conveniens Does Not Trigger Fee Shifting

Allen Matkins on

California generally follows the “American Rule” with respect to attorney’s fees. Trope v. Katz, 11 Cal.4th 274, 278 (1995). Under the American Rule each party to a lawsuit must ordinarily pay his own attorney’s fees. A...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide