News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Forum Selection

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Navigating the Hazards of US Litigation: Lessons from Recent Decisions Involving Korean Companies

Jenner & Block on

Notwithstanding recent political turmoil, Korean companies have been expanding into the United States at a fast clip, continuing a trend of investment beneficial to businesses in both countries. As Korean brands increasingly...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Franchise Agreement Requiring Out of State Mediation Is Unenforceable in California Background

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Dispute resolution provisions in franchise agreements often address how, when, and where parties will mediate. However, the enforceability of these provisions can change depending on the law of the state governing the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Actions Speak Louder Than Words: A Franchise Relationship Can Exist in Spite of a Contract’s Express Terms to the Contrary

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In OTG New York, Inc. v. Ottogi America, Inc., OTG was the exclusive regional distributor for food company Ottogi from 2008–23, during which Ottogi shipped inventory to OTG’s New Jersey warehouse. In 2024, Ottogi terminated...more

Lathrop GPM

Citing California Franchise Relations Act, California Federal Court Rejects Franchisor’s Attempt to Dismiss Case

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently denied a franchisor’s motion to dismiss litigation, holding that a franchise agreement provision requiring the parties to mediate in Texas prior to instituting litigation or arbitration...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Permissive Forum Selection Clause Is Not Enforceable in Franchisor’s Suit Against Franchisee

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A key term of any franchise agreement is the venue selection clause as this page has previously explained. This issue was at the forefront of Convenience Stores Leasing & Management, LLC’s (“CSLM”) August 2024 suit...more

Lathrop GPM

Wisconsin Federal Court Transfers Venue to Indiana Notwithstanding Forum Selection Clause

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Wisconsin recently transferred a franchisor’s breach of contract lawsuit to Indiana, the location of the franchisee, even though the parties’ supply agreement contained a Wisconsin forum selection clause....more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Grants Remediation Franchisor’s Motion to Stay Proceedings

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted Ringside Development Company’s motion to stay a franchisee-initiated lawsuit pending resolution through alternative dispute resolution. Jameson v. Ringside Development Company,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Forwarded Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

A district court in Arizona granted a franchisor’s motion to transfer venue to Missouri pursuant to the terms of the franchise agreement. S&G Elite LLC (“S&G”) and ST National Franchising, LLC (“Franchisor”) entered into a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Detailing Within a State Addendum

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court partially granted a motion to compel arbitration by car care franchisor Spiffy Franchising. However, the court invalidated provisions in the franchise agreement providing for dispute resolution in...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Should the Litigation be in State or Federal Court?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Deciding whether to choose state or federal court can be outcome determinative. This is particularly important in deciding to remove a case from state to federal court. Some state franchise statutes clearly allow a court to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Lights, Camera, Jurisdiction

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Texas denied an individual defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding the defendant—the owner of the company that was granted a franchise—was bound in his individual...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Franchise Agreements’ Arbitration Clauses Are Enforced Over Forum Selection Clauses in Subsequent Agreements with Franchisor

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Franchise agreements’ arbitration clauses are enforceable even when subsequent agreements between the same parties contain forum selection clauses requiring litigation in different forums. Additionally, a trial court’s...more

Lathrop GPM

Colorado Federal Court Denies Franchisee’s Motion to Dismiss on the Basis of Forum Non Conveniens Based on Forum Selection Clause...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Colorado denied WD Ventures, LLC’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ franchise agreement indicating that the parties contemplated federal...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Court Holds That Franchisee’s Owner Can Be Individually Bound by Franchise Agreement

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Alamo Intermediate II Holdings, LLC. v. Birmingham Alamo Movies, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, denied franchise owner Hunter Renfroe’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The...more

Lathrop GPM

Texas Federal Court Determines Forum Selection Clause Provides Personal Jurisdiction Over Franchisee Co-Owner Despite Not Signing...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Texas has denied an individual owner’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction despite the fact that he had not signed the relevant franchise agreement or corporate guaranty in his individual...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Leaky Forum Selection for Roofing Franchisor

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Indiana held that a forum selection clause in the franchise agreement prevailed over a competing forum selection clause in the personal guaranty....more

Lathrop GPM

Florida Federal Court Dismisses Matter Sua Sponte Pursuant to Forum-Selection Clause in the Franchise Agreement

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Florida recently dismissed a franchisee’s lawsuit sua sponte pursuant to the forum-selection clause in the parties’ franchise agreements, finding the clause valid, mandatory, and enforceable. Kava Culture...more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Concludes California Franchise Relations Act Applies to Termination of Operator Agreement

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California denied a subfranchisor’s motion to transfer venue, holding that its Operator Agreement constituted a franchise agreement, thus making its forum-selection clause void under the California...more

Lathrop GPM

Nevada Federal Court Transfers Venue to Illinois Notwithstanding Forum-Selection Clause

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Nevada recently transferred a franchisor’s trademark infringement lawsuit to Illinois, the location of the franchise, declining to rule on the franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction. Hofbräuhaus of...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Don’t Mess With Forum Selection Clauses

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in California granted a franchisor’s motion to transfer venue of claims brought by non-California franchisees to Texas. The ruling was based on a forum selection clause in the franchise agreements....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Sixth Circuit Holds Michigan Franchise Investment Law Voids Forum Selection Clause

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Sixth Circuit has held that a contractual forum-selection clause in a franchise agreement was unenforceable because it violated state law. In Lakeside Surfaces, Inc. v. Cambria Company, LLC, Lakeside Surfaces, a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Great Lakes Forum Selection Dispute

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal appellate court declined to enforce a choice-of-forum clause finding enforcement would conflict with Michigan’s Franchise Investment Law (“MFIL”). Lakeside Surfaces, Inc., a maker of stone countertops, sued...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Inhospitable Forum Selection Clause

Lewitt Hackman on

A hotel franchisee brought a class action lawsuit in Louisiana federal court on behalf of Louisiana franchisees. The franchisor moved to transfer the action to Georgia, based on the mandatory forum selection clause in the...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #271

Lathrop GPM on

Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Action Settlement Approval and Fee Award - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed the approval of a $10 million voucher settlement and a $2.6 million attorneys’ fee award in a class...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #269

Lathrop GPM on

Two Illinois Federal Courts Deny Class Certification in Anti-Poaching Class Actions Against Franchisors - Two federal courts in Illinois have rejected motions to certify classes of employees who worked in franchised...more

37 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide