News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Franchisee Motion to Dismiss

Foley & Lardner LLP

Franchise Agreement Requiring Out of State Mediation Is Unenforceable in California Background

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Dispute resolution provisions in franchise agreements often address how, when, and where parties will mediate. However, the enforceability of these provisions can change depending on the law of the state governing the...more

Lathrop GPM

Arizona Federal Court Dismisses Franchisee’s Defamation Counterclaims Against Franchisor

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Arizona recently dismissed a franchisee’s counterclaims for breach of contract, defamation, and injunctive relief against its former franchisor. LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Soc. Media Grp. LLC,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Handle Profit Projections With Care

Lewitt Hackman on

A New York federal court denied a franchisor’s motion to dismiss a franchisee’s complaint for misrepresentations and improper financial performance representations which allegedly induced the franchisee to enter into multiple...more

Lathrop GPM

Citing California Franchise Relations Act, California Federal Court Rejects Franchisor’s Attempt to Dismiss Case

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently denied a franchisor’s motion to dismiss litigation, holding that a franchise agreement provision requiring the parties to mediate in Texas prior to instituting litigation or arbitration...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Clear Terms of Franchise Agreement Are Enforced Against Franchisee

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A recent federal court decision in T&T Management, Inc. v. Choice Hotels, Inc. underscores key contractual and operational considerations for franchisors. T&T filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota...more

Lathrop GPM

North Dakota Federal Court Denies Subway’s Motion to Dismiss Franchisee Employee’s Vicarious Liability Sex Trafficking Claims

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in North Dakota recently denied a motion to dismiss vicarious liability claims against the corporate entities constituting the Subway franchise system. C.S. v. Subway Worldwide, Inc., 2025 WL 472475 (D.N.D....more

Lathrop GPM

Kansas Federal Court Finds Personal Jurisdiction Over Franchisee’s Alleged Competitive Business in Unfair Competition Case

Lathrop GPM on

In a franchisor’s suit against its franchisee and that franchisee’s new business, a federal court in Kansas recently denied the new business’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. HappyFeet-Legends Int’l, Inc....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Booked for Personal Jurisdiction

Lewitt Hackman on

The California Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s decision finding that a Texas court had personal jurisdiction over a California franchisee. GlobalCFO, LLC and GlobalCFO Franchise, LLC (collectively, “GlobalCFO”),...more

Lathrop GPM

Michigan Federal Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Claims Against One Owner of Franchisor, Denies Motion to Dismiss Claims Against...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Michigan recently granted a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction against one owner of a franchisor, while denying the motion to dismiss against the other owner and granting the franchisor’s...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Lights, Camera, Jurisdiction

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Texas denied an individual defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding the defendant—the owner of the company that was granted a franchise—was bound in his individual...more

Lathrop GPM

New York Federal Court Grants Hotel Franchisors’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on Negligence Claims

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in New York recently granted a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in an action asserting claims that franchisor Hyatt Corporation acted with negligence in connection with assaults to guests...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Court Holds That Franchisee’s Owner Can Be Individually Bound by Franchise Agreement

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Alamo Intermediate II Holdings, LLC. v. Birmingham Alamo Movies, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, denied franchise owner Hunter Renfroe’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The...more

Lathrop GPM

Maine Federal Court Grants Franchisor’s Motion to Dismiss Age Discrimination Claim Brought by Franchisee’s Independent Contractor

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Maine granted a franchisor’s motion to dismiss claims asserting that a franchisor was liable for its franchisee’s alleged age discrimination in employment. Goodwill v. Anywhere Real Est., 2023 WL 4034372...more

Lathrop GPM

Michigan Federal Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Michigan granted a motion to dismiss claims that franchisor Bateel International, LLC had violated the Michigan Franchise Investment Law and the Texas Business Opportunity Act. Luxury Concepts, Inc. v....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Pizza Franchisor’s Release Overcooked

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court denied a pizza franchisor’s motion to dismiss a former franchisee’s complaint, finding the former franchisee sufficiently pleaded the franchisor coerced the franchisee into signing a general release....more

Lathrop GPM

Delaware Bankruptcy Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Time-Barred Claims for Breach of Franchise Agreement

Lathrop GPM on

A federal bankruptcy court in Delaware has dismissed time-barred claims that a Chapter 7 Trustee alleged on behalf of a bankrupt franchisor, AVF Franchising, LLC, against several of its franchisees. In re Start Man Furniture,...more

Lathrop GPM

Maryland Federal Court Denies Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens but Grant’s Franchisee’s Motion to Dismiss for Personal...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Maryland granted a foreign hotel franchisee’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction but denied a forum non conveniens motion in a personal injury case naming both franchisor and franchisee as...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Subject Matter Mania…

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Florida dismissed an action by franchisees against their franchisor for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The franchisees asserted claims under California and Florida laws alleging the franchisor, OR...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Tax on Renewals

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Virginia denied tax franchisor, Liberty Tax’s, motion to dismiss complaints by two of its area developers (“ADs”). The ADs claimed Liberty Tax breached their contract for wrongfully terminating, failing to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Real Estate Amendment Not Up to Interpretation

Lewitt Hackman on

A franchisee sued real estate franchisor Century 21 for a declaration whether the franchisee could end its franchise agreement early despite a provision that deleted the franchisee’s early termination right. Noting the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: A Franchisor Without Urgency

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Alabama denied an urgent care franchisee’s motion to dismiss a suit brought by its franchisor. The franchisee argued the franchise agreement required suits to be brought within a one-year period. But the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Over Supply of Gasoline Burns Potential Sale

Lewitt Hackman on

A gasoline franchisee defeated a motion to dismiss brought by its franchisor, seeking to avoid a claim under the federal Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA). In 2018, Global Companies (Global) sent the franchisee a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Hot Doggin' Franchisee Sales Pitches

Lewitt Hackman on

Hot dog franchisor, Charlie Graingers, was unable to obtain dismissal of a federal lawsuit brought by franchisees alleging fraud, misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty....more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Pay Attention to Contractual Statutes of Limitation

Lewitt Hackman on

Many franchise agreements include a contractual limitation period or time limit when parties can bring a claim for relief. Though the franchise agreement is often written by and for the franchisor, these limitations can help...more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide