News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Fraud

Lathrop GPM

West Virginia Court of Appeals Enforces Release, Reverses Fraudulent Inducement Finding Against National Broker

Lathrop GPM on

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals reversed a decision that a national broker franchisor, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., fraudulently induced a franchisee into buying the business of another Ameriprise franchisee,...more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Enforces Hotel Franchisor’s Arbitration Provision and Compels Arbitration

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted a franchisor’s motion to compel arbitration and stay the lawsuit in a dispute alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and...more

Lathrop GPM

New York Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment on Franchise Sale Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in New York recently denied a franchisor’s motion for summary judgment on a franchisee’s claims for fraudulent misrepresentation. Cmty. Care Companions, Inc. v. Interim Healthcare, Inc., 2025 WL 929407...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Court Relies on Contractual Terms to Dismiss Dealership Suit Against Auto Manufacturer

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Decozen Chrysler Jeep Corp. (“Decozen”), a New Jersey-based automobile dealership, filed a lawsuit against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, LLC (“FCA”), in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that FCA...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

IFA Takeaways: How Smart Franchisors Stay Out of Court

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The International Franchise Association’s Annual Convention is always filled with useful take home information for franchise practitioners. Last week, I attended the session “Proactive Strategies for Franchisors to Prevent...more

Walkers

Speak no evil - no fraud by silence in Jersey law?

Walkers on

It has been an open question for almost 20 years whether a misrepresentation constituting dol (essentially, fraud) could be made by silence alone in Jersey law. The issue has now been laid to rest following the Royal Court...more

Lathrop GPM

North Carolina Federal Court Rules That Franchise Agreement’s 1-Year Statute of Limitations Clause Barred Action Against...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in North Carolina recently dismissed a complaint brought by Bigelow Corporation against its franchisor Hound Town USA because the claims were time barred. Bigelow Corporation v. Hounds Town USA, LLC, 2023 WL...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Insights and Takeaways From Our Top 10 Commercial Litigation Cases of 2022

Bennett Jones LLP on

Canadian courts rendered a number of notable decisions in the commercial litigation sphere in 2022 that made headlines for the impacts they will have on the landscape of businesses facing a dispute. Now that we are well into...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue #269

Lathrop GPM on

Two Illinois Federal Courts Deny Class Certification in Anti-Poaching Class Actions Against Franchisors - Two federal courts in Illinois have rejected motions to certify classes of employees who worked in franchised...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 268 (Distribution Issue)

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Periodically, The Franchise Memorandum focuses on topics primarily of interest to companies that use distributors and dealers rather than manage a business format franchise...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 265

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Fraud/Misrepresentation - Minnesota Federal Court Rules that Fraud and Misrepresentation...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 261

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Fifth Circuit Reverses Trial Court’s Excusal of Area Representative’s Tardy Renewal Notice -...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Expo is No Excuse

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Missouri ruled that a franchisee’s fraud claim cannot be based on the franchisor’s prediction at a franchise expo of future success in the franchised business....more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Bar-B-Q Blues — A Tale of Friendship, Partnership, and Deceit

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal appeals court reversed dismissal of a claim against a barbeque restaurant franchisor. The court found that, despite having signed releases in favor of the franchisor, a former franchisee had valid claims for...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: The Proof Is in the Writing

Lewitt Hackman on

Ten years after the franchisor of the EXIT real estate system entered into a franchise agreement for a franchisee to operate an EXIT franchise in Maitland, Florida, the parties entered into another franchise agreement for a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Precluding the Competition

Lewitt Hackman on

A commercial real estate relocation and consulting business franchisor (Relo) succeeded in getting a preliminary injunction to enforce a non-compete covenant against a former franchisee....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Hot Doggin' Franchisee Sales Pitches

Lewitt Hackman on

Hot dog franchisor, Charlie Graingers, was unable to obtain dismissal of a federal lawsuit brought by franchisees alleging fraud, misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty....more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Liability as Certain as Death & Taxes

Lewitt Hackman on

Structuring a franchise to reduce risk of joint employment and vicarious liability means limiting a franchisor's control over franchisees. This is a challenge in a professional services franchise, where the brand is...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Relying on Franchisor’s Profit Projections

Lewitt Hackman on

Most experienced franchisors know better than to make claims about profits franchisees can expect when those claims do not match the information in the franchisor's Franchise Disclosure Document. However, if a franchisor or...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Bankruptcy Discharges Franchise Law Claims

Lewitt Hackman on

A recent Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decision is a reminder of both a benefit of bankruptcy, in appropriate circumstances, and the need to respect the bankruptcy discharge a party obtains in the process. Mr. Lee was...more

Baker Donelson

California Dreams Becoming Reality for Franchisees; Amended Franchise Relationship Law Nears Passage

Baker Donelson on

The California State Assembly saw the seventh amended version of proposed changes to the California Franchise Relationship Act (CFRA) introduced August 17, 2015. This amendment is the product of industry negotiations that...more

Lewitt Hackman

Focused on Franchise - April 2014

Lewitt Hackman on

FRANCHISEE 101: Terminated Franchisee Can Pursue Fraudulent Disclosure Claims - In Solanki v. 7-Eleven, Inc., a U. S. District Court in New York ruled that a terminated 7-Eleven franchisee who decided to purchase a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Focused on Franchise Law - February 2014

Lewitt Hackman on

FRANCHISOR 101: Franchisor Successfully Fends Off Fraud Claims - There are circumstances when a fraud claim will not succeed against a franchisor. In Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC v. Claudia I, LLC, a...more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide