News & Analysis as of

Franchise Disclosure Document Franchise Investment Acts

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: A Franchise Nondisclosure Document

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court denied a motion to dismiss a former franchisee’s complaint against a healthcare recruitment franchisor’s Chief Executive Officer....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Poked in the Eye

Lewitt Hackman on

A poke restaurant franchisee in Ohio sued the franchisor for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL) and other claims. The franchisor defendants moved to dismiss the claims. A California federal court...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: The (Ice Cream) Cart Before the Rescission

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Cleveland rejected a California franchisee’s claim that an Ohio-based ice cream franchisor violated the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL). The claim failed because the franchisee could not show it...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide