News & Analysis as of

Fraud › Subcontractors › Construction Contracts

Fraud is the making of false representations or engaging in deceptive behavior in order to unlawfully secure financial or personal gain. 
Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC

White Lie Or Wire Fraud? Why Contractors Must Carefully Follow Contract Requirements

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC on

Can deception used to secure a construction project bid constitute mail or wire fraud, even if there was no intent to financially harm the bid solicitor or even lower the project’s cost? That’s one of the questions the United...more

Mayer Brown

Legal Developments in Construction Law: February 2024

Mayer Brown on

1. "Smash & grab" claim + true value claim = one adjudication dispute, or two? A subcontractor resisting enforcement of an adjudication award claimed that the adjudicator had exceeded their jurisdiction....more

Wiley Rein LLP

No Coverage for Loss in Consequence of Social Engineering Fraud

Wiley Rein LLP on

Applying North Carolina law, a federal district court has held that an E&O insurance policy does not provide coverage for loss arising from social engineering fraud despite the fact that the insured’s negligence also...more

Snell & Wilmer

California Construction Law Update for 2021

Snell & Wilmer on

In the 2020 COVID-19 year, there were not that many construction-related cases decided by the California Courts of Appeal, and none by the California Supreme Court. However, there were a number of interesting cases that raise...more

Woods Rogers

Payments Due Subcontractors and Suppliers in Virginia

Woods Rogers on

Virginia’s law on the payment of subcontractors and suppliers just got some muscles. For years, Virginia had a statute that made it a crime for any contractor or subcontractor “with the intent to defraud” to retain or use...more

K&L Gates LLP

Lessons in Fraud, Preconditions to Progress Payments and the Right of Setoff: Hutchinson v Glavcom

K&L Gates LLP on

The NSW Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in the matter of J Hutchinson Pty Ltd v Glavcom Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 126, in which K&L Gates represented Glavcom. The decision sheds light on numerous issues, including...more

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC

Third Circuit Allows for Offset when Calculating Loss in DBE Fraud Cases

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC on

In United States v. Nagle, the Third Circuit provided instruction on how to calculate the amount of “loss” defendants are attributed when being sentenced in a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) fraud case. Going...more

Troutman Pepper

Caught in the Middle: What Is a Supplier Supposed to Do When Its Customers Ask to Use a DBE as a Pass-Through?

Troutman Pepper on

Suppliers are caught in the middle of a new enforcement trend in federal, state, and local investigations of disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) fraud. Historically, DBE fraud investigations have focused on the...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide