News & Analysis as of

Harassment › Sexual Harassment › Vicarious Liability

McGlinchey Stafford

Are Employers Liable in Tort for Employees’ Sexual Assaults?

McGlinchey Stafford on

Should employers be liable in tort for their employees’ sexual assaults? Until recently, the universal answer was a resounding “no.” After all, an employer is only liable for their employees’ actions when the employee is...more

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL on

Most employers understand their obligation to prevent discrimination and harassment at work, and the significant consequences that can come if such treatment is allowed to occur. But what if an employee alleges harassment not...more

Seward & Kissel LLP

Employment Litigation Roundup: August 2024

Seward & Kissel LLP on

In a win for employers, the Connecticut Supreme Court defines “supervisor” narrowly for purposes of vicarious employer liability under Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act - Under Connecticut’s civil rights law, an...more

Miller Canfield

Michigan Supreme Court: Student-on-Student Harassment Not a Recognized Claim

Miller Canfield on

Can a student harassed by another student bring a lawsuit against the school for allegedly creating a hostile environment under state law? On July 29, 2024, the Michigan Supreme Court answered no....more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Reopening Workplaces: Employer Insurance Coverage for Sexual Harassment Claims Against Employees

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog on

For both good and ill, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered every facet of personal and professional life. For example, many employees have enjoyed unprecedented freedom to work remotely. However, with vaccines becoming more...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Sixth Circuit Shuts Down EEOC’s Appeal In Sex Harassment Suit

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by the EEOC, the Sixth Circuit affirmed a U.S. District Court’s grant of an employer’s motion for summary judgment after finding that the harassing employee was not a...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Landmark Ruling: Franchisor Not Liable Absent Employment Related Control

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On August 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in favor of Domino's Pizza and all business format franchisors that do business in California. In Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, ---P.3d---, 2014 WL...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

Who Is Really A Supervisor? Employer Liability For Hostile Work Environment Claims

Akerman LLP - HR Defense on

The Supreme Court recently held oral arguments in the case Vance v. Ball State University, 646 F.3d 461 (7th Cir. 2011), which addresses the meaning of a "supervisor" in hostile work environment claims. If the Court applies...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide