News & Analysis as of

Healthcare Fraud › Litigation Strategies › But For Causation

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

First Circuit Requires But-for Causation for AKS-Based FCA Liability, Bolsters Majority View

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on

What is the proper causation standard for an Anti-Kickback Statute violation to trigger liability under the False Claims Act? The First Circuit has answered that question in a much anticipated interlocutory decision in...more

McCarter & English, LLP

Federal Courts Decide on FCA Claims Actions

McCarter & English, LLP on

There are still several unsettled legal issues regarding the standards applicable to a False Claims Act (FCA) claim, such as the standard to prove causation when an FCA claim is based on a violation of the Anti-Kickback...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

First Circuit Reins In Broad Theory of Liability Under AntiKickback Statute by Adopting “But-For Causation” Standard

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The First Circuit joins the Sixth and Eighth Circuits in adopting a more exacting causation standard for False Claims Act liability premised on Anti-Kickback Statute violations. In a victory for False Claims Act (FCA)...more

Goodwin

First Circuit Adopts Defense-Friendly “But-For” Causation Standard for AKS-Predicated FCA Claims

Goodwin on

In a unanimous panel opinion filed on February 18, 2025, the First Circuit held that False Claims Act cases predicated on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), require proof that alleged kickbacks were the...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide