News & Analysis as of

Healthcare Fraud › Statutory Interpretation › Supreme Court of the United States

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP

First Circuit Decision Regarding Anti-Kickback Statute Standard Widens Circuit Split and Creates Potential for Supreme Court...

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in United States v. Regeneron, has joined the Sixth and Eighth Circuits in adopting the “but-for” standard to find that a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) triggers...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The Verdict Is In: SuperValu Wins at Trial Despite Knowingly Submitting False Claims

Paul Hastings LLP on

In 2023, we wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex. rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. interpreting the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter standard to require inquiry into a defendant’s subjective knowledge....more

Cozen O'Connor

Thompson May Give Defendants New Tools to Fight False Claims Act Charges

Cozen O'Connor on

The Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Thompson v. United States may have significant implications for the False Claims Act (FCA). In Thompson, the Court was tasked with interpreting 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which prohibits...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Circuit Split Deepens on Anti-Kickback Statute’s Causation Standard

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

Introduction: In its recent decision in United States v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit deepened an existing federal circuit court split regarding the causation...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide