News & Analysis as of

Human Resources Professionals › Appeals › Employment Policies

Foley & Lardner LLP

Appeals Court Says Disability Not Required in Order to Recover Back Pay for Violation of ADA’s Medical Inquiry and Examination...

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Most employers are aware that, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), disability-related inquiries and medical examinations of employees may only be required when such inquiries and examinations are “job-related and...more

Stoel Rives - World of Employment

Federal Court of Appeals Stays Preliminary Injunction on Trump DEI Executive Orders

Stoel Rives - World of Employment on

On Friday, March 14, 2025, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a preliminary injunction on President Trump’s Executive Orders regarding DEI.  In concurring opinions, the judges expressed varying levels of support for...more

McAfee & Taft

Employers, resolve to tackle this simpler HR checklist before the new year begins

McAfee & Taft on

New Year’s resolutions. Be they professional or personal, simplistic or life-altering, the beginning of the year affords a fantastic, albeit arbitrary, opportunity to effectuate change. Whatever. I’m not great about keeping...more

Holland & Hart - Employers' Lawyers

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Workplace Policies Against Secret Recordings

Holland & Hart - Employers' Lawyers on

In recent years, the issue of secret recordings by employees has sparked considerable controversy. You may recall the recent incident involving an employee at CloudFlare, who filmed herself for nine minutes while questioning...more

Fisher Phillips

4-Point Plan To Avoid Costly Workplace Mistakes

Fisher Phillips on

When a California Court of Appeal revived a workplace lawsuit alleging state law disability discrimination and retaliation claims that had originally been dismissed by a trial court, it did more than decide that the mistaken...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Oregon Upholds Meal-Break Compliance

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

On Thursday, November 14, 2019, the Oregon Court of Appeals released its decision in Maza v. Waterford Operations, LLC, 300 Or App 471 (2019), that clarified Oregon employers’ obligation to ensure that non-exempt employees...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

North Carolina Appellate Decisions Reach Different Conclusions With Regard to Disqualification for Unemployment Benefits Due to...

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14.6, individuals are disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits if they are discharged due to misconduct associated with the work. On September 3, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued...more

McAfee & Taft

New employment discrimination standard: Comparators must be similarly-situated ‘in all material respects’

McAfee & Taft on

In making disciplinary decisions, a question often posed in the human resources office is whether the disciplinary action is consistent with past discipline to other employees. The reason for this question is that disparate...more

Fisher Phillips

Protecting Employees From Patient Harassment: It’s No Laughing Matter

Fisher Phillips on

“Claims of sexual harassment typically involve the behavior of fellow employees. But not always.” So begins a recent opinion from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that illustrates the dangers of failing to take an employee’s...more

McAfee & Taft

Remarks and inconsistent stories fuel pregnancy discrimination claim

McAfee & Taft on

An employer’s shifting rationale for termination doomed it to facing a jury trial on a pregnancy discrimination claim in the recent case Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions....more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide