News & Analysis as of

Injunctions Appeals Constitutional Challenges

Holland & Knight LLP

Court of Appeals Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs, Setting Stage for Supreme Court Ruling

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7‑4 decision on Aug. 29, 2025, struck down President Donald Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA or the Act) to impose sweeping tariffs...more

Alston & Bird

Federal Circuit Decision on IEEPA Tariffs Appealed to Supreme Court

Alston & Bird on

On September 3, 2025, the U.S. government filed a petition for a writ of certiorari requesting that the Supreme Court review on an expedited basis the 7-4 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms IEEPA Tariffs Are Illegal

Earlier this year, the U.S. Court of International Trade found that President Donald Trump had exceeded the powers granted to him under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) in imposing “Trafficking...more

Blank Rome LLP

Court of Appeals Rules That President Lacks Authority for Broad Tariffs

Blank Rome LLP on

On August 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) ruled that the President cannot impose broad tariffs of unlimited duration using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”)....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Federal Circuit Finds IEEPA Reciprocal Tariffs and Trafficking Tariffs Illegal but Continue to Be Required at Time of Entry

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held unenforceable the Trump administration’s Reciprocal Tariffs and Trafficking Tariffs instituted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In V.O.S....more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms That IEEPA Tariffs Are Unlawful

On Friday, August 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision striking down the global reciprocal tariffs (“Reciprocal Tariffs”) and the fentanyl-related tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Federal Circuit Finds IEEPA Fentanyl and Reciprocal Tariffs Illegal But Continue to Be Required at Time of Entry

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in VOS Selections Inc. v. United States where the plaintiffs challenged the validity and legality of the Trump administration’s tariffs instituted under...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

5th Circuit Decision Could Encourage Employers to File Lawsuits to Escape NLRB Trials

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said the structure of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is likely unconstitutional and enjoined the agency from conducting trials of unfair labor practice...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Fifth Circuit Upholds Enactment of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

On August 15, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned a federal district court’s decision to block the enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) against the State of Texas....more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship

As an update to our previous client alert regarding birthright citizenship, on July 23, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Supreme Court restricts universal injunctions, but plaintiffs find a “workaround”

At the end of its 2024-25 term, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA, Inc. that federal district courts do not have equity power to issue so-called “universal” (also known as “nationwide”) injunctions. At issue in...more

Carlton Fields

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of June 30 - July 3, 2025

Carlton Fields on

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals - Lamonaco v. Experian - arbitration - Labriola v. Miami-Dade - employment, First Amendment - Wood v. Fla DOE - school, transgender, § 1000.071, First Amendment - USA v....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Two Recent Supreme Court Injunction Rulings Support Affordable Care Act

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Two recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings support provisions of the Affordable Care Act, one directly and one indirectly....more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Judge Rules Thousands of Venezuelan TPS Beneficiaries Remain Work Authorized; Group Focuses on DHS Venezuela, Haiti TPS Decision

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On June 2, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot invalidate Venezuela Temporary Protected Status (TPS) documents, including work authorization documents,...more

Morgan Lewis

Courts Invalidate President’s IEEPA Tariffs, But Stays Keep Duties on Imports—for Now

Morgan Lewis on

The US Court of International Trade and the US District Court for the District of Columbia have invalidated President Donald Trump’s actions imposing tariffs pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Tariffs Cancelled By Courts—Or Are They?

Jenner & Block on

Two courts this week invalidated the tariffs issued by the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). First, late Wednesday night (May 28), the US Court of International Trade (CIT) in V.O.S. v....more

Torres Trade Law, PLLC

Court of International Trade Blocks Most Trump Tariffs

On May 28, 2025, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) held that all Trump administration tariff actions based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) are unconstitutional....more

Cozen O'Connor

U.S. Court of International Trade Enjoins IEEPA Tariffs, But Federal Circuit Stays the Injunctions

Cozen O'Connor on

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) issued a decision vacating and permanently enjoining many of the most economically significant tariff orders issued over the past four months by President Trump....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Federal Court Strikes Down Two Key Tariffs, Appeal Pending

McGuireWoods LLP on

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade declared key tariffs implemented by the Trump administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) unconstitutional. The ruling directly impacts...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump’s Border Emergency and Global Tariffs

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

President Trump exceeded his emergency authority when he imposed tariffs on Canadian, Chinese, and Mexican origin goods citing border issues, and global reciprocal tariffs the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) said on...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Federal Trade Court Rules Trump Lacks Authority for Tariffs Under IEEPA - D.C. District Court also finds tariffs unconstitutional...

Pierce Atwood LLP on

On May 29, 2025, in a fast-moving case involving President Trump’s authority to issue tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit temporarily stayed...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

The U.S. Court of International Trade Stops Several IEEPA Tariffs

Warner Norcross + Judd on

On May 28, the U.S. Court of International Trade in a case challenging tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) filed by V.O.S. Selections, Inc. and other plaintiffs, and joined in...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court Strikes Down Trump's Emergency Tariffs, Immediately Halts Collections

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a sweeping decision released May 28, 2025, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) invalidated a broad set of tariffs imposed by President Trump earlier this year under the International...more

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC

Supreme Court Chooses Not to Review Challenge to New York Gun Law

In April, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Antonyuk v. James, a case challenging many of the restrictions imposed by New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA). As a result, the Second Circuit’s...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

District Court Issues Permanent Injunction Enjoining Enforcement of Prop 65 Warning Requirements for Dietary Acrylamide

On May 2, 2025, the Eastern District of California found that Prop 65 warning requirements for dietary acrylamide violate the First Amendment, and granted a permanent injunction enjoining enforcement of those warnings....more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide