News & Analysis as of

Insurance Litigation › Easements › Duty to Defend

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

California Appeals Court Reinforces that Insurer Failure to Investigate Potential Bases for Coverage Outside the Pleadings Can...

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog on

In the recently published case Bartel v. Chicago Title Insurance Company, a California appellate court reaffirmed longstanding California law on insurers’ broad duty to defend even in the face of complicated underlying facts,...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Owes Duty to Defend and Indemnify Nuisance Litigation

Wiley Rein LLP on

A federal district court, applying California law, has held that an insurer owed a duty to defend and indemnify an insured in an underlying nuisance litigation under a not-for-profit D&O policy, as the policy’s pollution,...more

Cozen O'Connor

The Thrilla over Manila: Washington Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend Clam Demand

Cozen O'Connor on

The Washington Supreme Court’s latest insurance coverage case, Robbins, et al. v. Mason County Title Insurance Co., et al., Slip Op. 96726-1 (May 7, 2020), marks another expansion of insurers’ duty to defend in Washington....more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide