News & Analysis as of

Insurance Litigation Estoppel

Kennedys

Appellate Court of Illinois decision reminds insurers to communicate with insureds or face potential consequences: Estoppel of...

Kennedys on

The Appellate Court of Illinois recently reminded insurers that they may be estopped from raising coverage defenses through their misleading acts or statements, including silence. In Monroy-Perez v. Sentry Select Ins. Co.,...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update — Compilation 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The owners hired a general contractor (GC) insured by Amerisure to build a movie theatre, and the GC hired a masonry subcontractor (Sub) insured by Selective under a primary and umbrella policy...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Related Claim Provision Bars Coverage for Discrimination Claims Asserted Over a Six-Year Period

Wiley Rein LLP on

Applying Illinois law, the First District Appellate Court of Illinois has held that a related wrongful acts provision barred coverage for a series of “claims” made over the course of six years because the claims—as the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

No Coverage for Claims Made Outside of Claims-Made Policy Period

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has granted a legal professional liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment, holding that its claims-made policy did not...more

White and Williams LLP

Top Developments March 2023

White and Williams LLP on

Chem. Solvents, Inc. v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 868 (6th Cir. Jan. 13, 2023) - A divided Sixth Circuit panel holds that, under Ohio’s “all sums” allocation scheme, “targeted” insurers may seek indemnity...more

Cozen O'Connor

Avoid Creating Coverage By Estoppel, Waiver & Forfeiture: California

Cozen O'Connor on

Waiver, estoppel and forfeiture are doctrines on which insureds often rely to try to create coverage outside the terms of the insurance policy. Insureds will often assert that they are entitled to such extra-contractual...more

Wiley Rein LLP

No Coverage for Lawsuit That Related Back to Claim Made During Prior Policy Period

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying Arkansas law, has affirmed a ruling in favor of an insurer holding that there was no coverage for a claim made during one policy period but not reported...more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona District Court Enforces “Virus Exclusion” to Dismiss COVID-19 Related Insurance Claims of Minor League Baseball Teams

Jaburg Wilk on

The Holding - In Chattanooga Prof’l Baseball LLC, v. Nat’l Cas. Co., 2020 WL 6699480 (D. Ariz. Nov. 13, 2020) (Order), the Arizona District Court held that a “Virus Exclusion” clearly precluded insurance coverage for losses...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Estopped from Denying Coverage for Legal Malpractice Action But Not Subsequent Disgorgement Action

Wiley Rein LLP on

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, applying Pennsylvania law, has held that an insurer is estopped from denying coverage for a legal malpractice action after defending the action for over a year...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Principles of Waiver and Estoppel Can be Used to Establish the Existence of an Effective Insurance Contract

In Dones v. Life Ins. Co. of North America (No. A157662, filed 10/7/20), a California appeals court held that whether an insurer had waived or was estopped to assert that an “active service” requirement prevented inception of...more

Carlton Fields

Federal Puerto Rico Court Affirms That Coverage Under Claims-Made Policy Is Not Created by Waiver or Estoppel

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico recently granted summary judgment in favor of Liberty International Underwriters after determining that coverage was not created by waiver or estoppel for a claim first...more

White and Williams LLP

“Based On”… What Exactly? NJ Appellate Division Examines Phrase and Estops Insurer From Disclaiming Coverage for 20-Month Delay

White and Williams LLP on

On May 28, 2019, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division examined the phrase “based on” in an assault-and-battery exclusion, finding that the phrase means “to make, form, or serve as the foundation of any claim,...more

White and Williams LLP

Appellate Division: Violation of New York Insurance Law § 3420(d)(2) Does Not Constitute an Unfair Claims Handling Practice

White and Williams LLP on

Casualty insurers doing business in the state of New York that wish to deny coverage on a claim for death or bodily injury are subject to the timing requirements set forth in New York Insurance Law (NYIL) § 3420(d)(2), which...more

White and Williams LLP

Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – February 2018

White and Williams LLP on

An Insurer’s Guide to Reserving Rights: Tips for Avoiding Waiver and Estoppel - Insurers know all too well that the penalties for an ineffective reservation of rights letter can be severe...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: Court of Appeal holds that a failure to exercise a “duty to speak” can form the basis of an estoppel

Cooley LLP on

In Ted Baker PLC v (1) AXA Insurance UK PLC (2) Fusion Insurance Services Ltd (3) Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 4097 Ted Baker PLC (TB) suffered significant business interruption losses as a result of...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending April 28 & May 5, 2017

Carlton Fields on

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE - Foreclosure: final summary judgment in borrower’s favor inappropriate where borrower merely asserted that lender mistakenly filed copy of original note with court, instead of original, and where...more

Cozen O'Connor

Washington Court Rejects Bad Faith Coverage by Estoppel Because Insured Was Insulated from Liability

Cozen O'Connor on

This week, the Division I Washington Court of Appeals granted partial relief to an insurer and held that if an insured is legally insulated from any exposure to a tort victim, the presumption of harm in a bad faith claim...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Seventh Circuit Issues Stern Warning For Insurers That Reject Their Duty to Defend

Proskauer Rose LLP on

The first line of the Seventh Circuit’s opinion says it all: “This case provides a warning for insurance companies who refuse to defend their insureds.” As the court’s admonishment suggests, insurers that improperly refuse to...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide