News & Analysis as of

Insurance Litigation › Pollution Exclusion › Summary Judgment

Rivkin Radler LLP

April 2025 Insurance Update

Rivkin Radler LLP on

As temperatures in the Northeast have made it feel more like winter than spring, it’s only fitting that we begin our April Insurance Update with a case from Alaska. There, the Alaska Supreme Court decides for the first time...more

Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP

Are PFAS Claims Excluded Under A Pollution Exclusion? A California Court Finds It Depends.

Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP on

This article will discuss policyholder concerns after a California federal court recently found that some PFAS claims in an MDL were excluded under a pollution exclusion, but others were not. The case is Nat'l Foam, Inc. v....more

Carlton Fields

Clearing The Air: Tenth Circuit Strikes Down An Indoor Air Quality Exclusion, Citing Ambiguity

Carlton Fields on

Ambiguity strikes again. While the heavily litigated pollution exclusion is well-known in the insurance world, its progeny—the indoor air exclusion—only recently has started making its way around the block. ...more

Carlton Fields

In Indiana, an Absolute Pollution Exclusion May Exclude Absolutely Nothing

Carlton Fields on

A recent article in the Sports section of The Miami Herald read “Shooting coach helps Winslow.” Perhaps, but it probably didn’t help the coach much. The admonition to “eat every carrot and pea on your plate” undoubtedly...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide