News & Analysis as of

Intellectual Property Litigation › Appeals › Article III

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Navigating Shockwave Medical: Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Standing, and Obviousness

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

This Federal Circuit opinion analyzes various key issues in patent litigation, including the role of applicant admitted prior art (“AAPA”), standing, and obviousness. Background - Shockwave Medical, Inc. (“Shockwave”)...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Royal Play Penalty: No Standing in the End (Zone)

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, finding that the appellant lacked standing because it failed to allege any actual and particularized injury. Michael...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Blurred Vision: Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed a patent challenger’s appeal in an inter partes review (IPR) because the challenger could not meet the injury-in-fact requirement for Article III standing. Platinum...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Sour Grapes: Winery Minority Ownership Insufficient for Statutory Standing at Trademark Board

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a petition seeking to cancel the registered marks of two wineries, finding the petitioner (a trust owning an interest in a competitor winery) lacked...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide