News & Analysis as of

Intellectual Property Protection › Patents › Foreign Manufacturers

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Section 337 Now Viable for “Mere Importers” After Federal Circuit’s Lashify Decision

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

For years, the U.S. International Trade Commission maintained that the potent remedies available under Section 337 were unavailable to intellectual property owners considered to be nothing more than “mere importers.” That...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

The Tall Tale of the Domestic Industry

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

There is a common misconception the domestic industry economic prong requirement is insurmountable and an unknowable factor in a patent infringement action at the International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”),...more

Mintz

ITC Provides Clarity on the Meaning of a Section 337(a)(2) “Article”

Mintz on

A recent decision by the International Trade Commission (“ITC” or the “Commission”) held that pre-commercial or non-commercial items qualify as “articles” for purposes of section 337 investigations. The decision opens up the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

New Types of Section 337 Investigations at the International Trade Commission

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Most Section 337 investigations allege violations of intellectual property (“IP”) based rights involving patent, registered trademark, or registered copyright infringement (“statutory IP claims”). In such cases, the...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide