News & Analysis as of

Interference Proceeding Patent Trial and Appeal Board Obviousness

Knobbe Martens

No Shenanigans: IPRs and Interference Estoppel

Knobbe Martens on

IGT v. ZYNGA INC. - Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Interference estoppel does not apply when the interference was terminated due to a threshold issue....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries

We are excited to share Sheppard Mullin’s inaugural quarterly report on key Federal Circuit decisions. The Spring 2023 Quarterly Report provides summaries of most key patent law-related decisions from January 1, 2023 to March...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

PTAB Hears Oral Argument on Motions in Interference No. 106,115

On Monday, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) heard oral argument (remotely) from Senior Party the Broad Institute (and its partners as Senior Party, Harvard University and MIT) and Junior Party the University of...more

Knobbe Martens

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - On September 10, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc., affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)’s determination of no...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide