News & Analysis as of

Investors › Corporate Veil › Piercing the Corporate Veil

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Court Affirms $1.6B Judgment in Bahamas Mega Project Dispute

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

A New York appeals court has affirmed a $1.6 billion award for the developer of a Bahamas mega project against various subsidiaries of China State Construction Engineering Corporation, the world’s largest construction company...more

Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co.

Israeli National Labor Court Rules Investors Are Not Employers

Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co. on

The Israeli National Labor Court recently issued a ruling addressing a claim to “lift the corporate veil” in a dispute between two groups of shareholders in a company. The National Labor Court’s ruling did not allow the...more

Proskauer - The Capital Commitment

Veil-Piercing Under California Law – Heightened Risks for Fund Managers

Proskauer - The Capital Commitment on

We recently posted about the risks associated with veil-piercing claims and the ways in which fund managers can protect themselves from exposure to these claims. Our first post on veil-piercing focused on Delaware standards,...more

Proskauer - The Capital Commitment

Veil Piercing/Alter Ego Determinations – How Fund Managers Can Protect Themselves

Proskauer - The Capital Commitment on

A veil piercing claim can be a worst-case scenario for a private fund manager dealing with a struggling portfolio company investment – the company fails, and ensuing legal claims are brought not only against the portfolio...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide